|
|
|
|
|
That posting bug has been addressed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Romy the Cat's
personal site dedicated to advanced audio and evolved music reproduction
techniques
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
I think you got spoiled with a lifelike sound reproducing music system (lifelike to your ears and in your brain - some systems do approach that level but than something else is lost like the festivity of getting dressed and going to a concert of your...
|
|
Nothing wrong with feeling the venue (although I think that feeling the venue can only be had by going to "the venue" - the venue can never and should not be attempted to be recreated as an audio goal in my mind - unless you want to be frustrated wit...
|
|
The truth of the matter is that I believe that true quality has nothing do with audio systems, high resolution or otherwise.How many good musicians are audiophiles? and does it matter?They can listen via an Internet Radio and enjoy as the music is in...
|
|
I gave a thought to your claim of a non-objective and superficial judgment of digital audio when comparing CD's to LP's.If I understand it correctly, the raw file has potential to sound very good (given no losses or damage when downloading and given ...
|
|
I am beginning to somewhat agree with this statement as I am always amazed how selective an audio system gets as it becomes a high-resolution one.Rock and pop never sounds good anymore (because the system just tells it like it is). However there is s...
|
|
[quote user="Romy the Cat"]Anyhow, the point is that audio people do not deal with original raw digital file therefore their comments about Analog vs. Digital are not relevant as they do not see the true digital but rather a digital crap. [/quote]Hi ...
|
|
|
|
|
All context of this site except the Forum's posts
Copyright © Roman Bessnow 2004-2025
All messages within the Site’s Forum Copyright © by
authors of the posts
|
|
Last 24-hours posts: |
1 |
|
 |
|
|
Total human visitors: |
54,844,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|