|
Romy the Cat's
personal site dedicated to advanced audio and evolved music reproduction
techniques
|
|
|
|
|
This subject of digital crossovers became quite popular during last few years and many audio-people give up and go for a simplicity and painlessness of digital crossovering. There is an army of people out there who would swear by a complete transpare...
|
This subject of digital crossovers became quite popular during last few years and many audio-people give up and go for a simplicity and painlessness of digital crossovering. There is an army of people out there who would swear by a complete transpare...
|
Interesting topic. Anyone going the digital x-over route should keep in mind that if you just put a digital x-over into an existing system you are going to be disapointed, and I don't care what brand crossover you are using. You have to get the level...
|
Nice posts Romy and Jan, agree almost 100%. I've heard the Behringer in an originally crummy system and it butchered things completely. The input levels were low, which as you point out, won't have helped at all.On a vaguely related note: I dunno if ...
|
Hi,[quote user="Romy the Cat"]This subject of digital crossovers became quite popular during last few years and many audio-people give up and go for a simplicity and painlessness of digital crossovering.[/quote]Well, digital X-Overs would appear to o...
|
Hi
Good news if the analogue stages of the DCX2496 is so bad.
So the improvement of a modified unit should be worth the ekstra work,
and remove some of the x-overs negative influence on the sound.
Which is always good to know beforehand.
Th...
|
Digital Crossovers are wonderful. They are wonderful because they might help to very easy to learn if you are not a Moron ™. I have covered this subject in the threads:
Dream Hi-Eff Speakers for an “inmate” and in Horns and digital crossovers.Still...
|
I certainly DO NOT state that anyone who advocates use of digital crossovers is an idiot but I do observe a very interesting pattern. There are a large number of people among Internat High-End Audio whom I do know and who are perfectly qualified to b...
|
Hi Romy,I am curious as to why you object to the use of digital crossovers. Is it solely due to the ADC for analog sources? Assuming that digital is the sole source, would you still conceptually object and why? I realize you probably have touched...
|
[quote user="Kerry Brown"]I don't understand when you say active crossovers don't attenuate. Mine does. Very well too, I can trim channels to match each other perfectly. And DEQX volume control is 'analog' = step ladder resistors. [/quote] I am not...
|
Hi Romy,I am curious as to why you object to the use of digital crossovers. Is it solely due to the ADC for analog sources? Assuming that digital is the sole source, would you still conceptually object and why? I realize you probably have touched...
|
I certainly DO NOT state that anyone who advocates use of digital crossovers is an idiot but I do observe a very interesting pattern. There are a large number of people among Internat High-End Audio whom I do know and who are perfectly qualified to b...
|
So, you use DCX 2496 for deals but not for crossovering and your crossovers are still on analog domain, right? Romy, I do everything in the digital domain so I use DCX 2496 as my crossover as well (but analog SS pro amps). I know you're no big fan of...
|
[quote user="slowmotion"]Good news if the analogue stages of the DCX2496 is so bad. So the improvement of a modified unit should be worth the ekstra work, and remove some of the x-overs negative influence on the sound. Which is always good to know be...
|
I am really not an expert in digital crossovers. I rented in past a few, inducing the Behringer DCX2496 that Thorsten mentioned. I less was concern at that time about the unit as prototyping crossover but rather was trying to learn if the digital cro...
|
[quote user="slowmotion"]Romy, there are more ways to the top of the mountain... <BR>And we already know that your way isn't my way... <BR><BR>You bring up many very valid points, but still I will continue to use my digital crossove...
|
Yes, T, I understand it all. However, returning back to the subject, I would like the message be stressed: I feel that if people seriously contemplating the digital crossovers then they fight wrong fight for the wrong reasons. Do you remember the jok...
|
All digital domain volume controls (or crossovers, which is the same) by definition reduce amount of bits. Some “creative” companies fight within by introducing the additional processing after the bits were lost in order to hide the fact that they op...
|
[quote user="Kerry Brown"]My system is 4-way using 2x DEQX HDP-4 processors; 2xNuForce mono amps on the midrange horns and 6 x channels of a 7-channel NuForce HT amp that uses the same circuit. The DEQX processors function as crossovers, speaker 'cor...
|
Romy,
Why preface my comments ? I've had the same system for 10 years basically. I do use digital crossovers but the 'Class D' NuForce amps are not digital at all. And the NuForce amps don't sound like stereotypical Class D amps, they are very quie...
|
To follow up on Romy's latest broadcast on his visit to my house.My left and right speakers consist of Jl Audio 113 revision 2 subs to 70 Hz., Edgar 50 Hz. 6 foot Straight horns with two 12 inch electravoice drivers each to 500 Hz, Edgar round mid ho...
|
ACTIVE CROSSOVERS
1) Loudspeaker drive units of different sensitivities may be used in one system without the need for lossy resistive networks ( and L-Pads ) or transformers
( DEQX lets me use 98 ...
|
“Gravity, is a natural phenomenon by which physical bodies attract with a force proportional to their mass”. Try to fuck with it!
[quote user="Kerry Brown"] Marc, please surf the web for more information, there are many sophisticated systems t...
|
[quote user="jtavan"] I would be interested to hear your reaction to the same CD ripped properly on a CD-ROM drive rather than recorded from SPDIF stream. If your transport is VERY good, they should be equivalent... but on damaged discs, or with bad ...
|
Hi,[quote user="Romy the Cat"]However, returning back to the subject, I would like the message be stressed: I feel that if people seriously contemplating the digital crossovers then they fight wrong fight for the wrong reasons. [/quote]That is where ...
|
The more I think about it the more I realized that this 120dB per octave crossover is very interesting move. For sure it is bold move. There are unquestionable benefits of such a “barbaric” crossover as the throwing way bits at the signal get attenu...
|
[quote user="Bud"]You need to find an individual who can design series crossovers. Both JBL and Altec used these, because they sounded best. You will need to look for an individual near where you live because they will have to test the drivers as...
|
Digital Crossovers are wonderful. They are wonderful because they might help to very easy to learn if you are not a Moron ™. I have covered this subject in the threads:
Dream Hi-Eff Speakers for an “inmate” and in Horns and digital crossovers.Still...
|
[quote user="Romy the Cat"]The rule of the game is the analog can’t delay but only filter but digital can’t filter but only delay.[/quote]A few years ago, I looked into replacing my analogue crossovers with digital ones - I wanted to try steeper than...
|
[quote user="Kerry Brown"] For years, I used to have passive line level filters and tube amps - single ended 45's and 2A3's.
To make a long story short I am much happier now. Screw tubes ! ( Don't hate me. ) [/quote]
Kerry, I do not think that som...
|
|
|
|
All context of this site except the Forum's posts
Copyright © Roman Bessnow 2004-2024
All messages within the Site’s Forum Copyright © by
authors of the posts
|
Last 24-hours posts: |
2 |
|
|
|
Total human visitors: |
43,285,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pasquini, Bernardo (7 Dece»
|
Purcell, Henry (7 March 16»
|
Tárrega, Francisco (2»
|
Godowsky, Leopold (13 Febr»
|
Karg-Elert, Sigfrid (21 No»
|
Martin, Frank (15 Septembe»
|
Rathaus, Karol (16 Septemb»
|
Paciorkiewicz, Tadeusz (17»
|
Simpson, Robert (2 March 1»
|
Williamson, Malcolm (21 No»
|
Gudmundsen-Holmgreen, Pell»
|
|
|
|
|