| Search | Login/Register
   Home » Audio Discussions » We who are about to die... (a cable thread) (55 posts, 3 pages)
  Print Thread | 1st Post |  
Page 3 of 3 (55 items) Select Pages:  « 1 2 3
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  Do not touch that used tonearm!..  Tonearm running-in...  Audio For Dummies ™  Forum     7  82177  01-30-2007
  »  New  Any good sounding AES/EBU interfaces out there?..  Better keep with AN cables...  Didital Things  Forum     53  429714  09-17-2007
  »  New  Purist Audio Design vs. Purist Audio Design..  Maybe we need phantom power?...  Audio Discussions  Forum     25  234587  04-06-2008
  »  New  The “Wet and Fuzzy” cable...  The “Wet and Fuzzy” cable....  Audio Discussions  Forum     0  15786  05-09-2008
  »  New  Cable Current Loading..  The Purist’s Problems...  Audio Discussions  Forum     5  37220  05-14-2008
  »  New  Chasing utopian better phono interconnect...  Did I miss something?...  Analog Playback Forum     6  110933  06-05-2008
  »  New  FM and … cables…..  Cables as Sound Shapers...  Off Air Audio Forum     4  45429  04-15-2009
  »  New  The BEST bass cable?..  Dialectic biased cable....  Audio Discussions  Forum     4  44996  04-22-2011
04-29-2021 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
xandcg


Rio de Janeiro, BR.
Posts 218
Joined on 09-07-2014

Post #: 51
Post ID: 26141
Reply to: 26139
Pure Red Copper.
 N-set wrote:
IIRC, Viborg uses what they call red copper, which is probably red brass - a high Cu content brass, quite a bit harder than pure Cu. Visually and under a few strokes of a metal saw (I wanted to check if this is not a plating) behaves indeed like a 'hard copper'. I protect the surfaces I can reach using Paul's method (I 'hate' you for that Paul, takes so much time): jewellery polish (me by hand) - isoprop cleaning - dielectric grease (silicon based DC-4)


If Viborg is following the market standards and I think so, "Red Copper" or "Pure Red Copper" is Cu2O, the first stage of the Copper Oxide. But I don't remember of anything about red copper on Vigorg literature except, may be, on power cables.



Think for yourself, do not be sheep.
04-30-2021 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
N-set
Gdansk, Poland
Posts 617
Joined on 01-07-2006

Post #: 52
Post ID: 26142
Reply to: 26141
Don't really care much
Might be. Honestly I don't care until they sound good. In Paul's construction they do (thank you Paul!)



Cheers,
Jarek
STACORE
04-30-2021 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Paul S
San Diego, California, USA
Posts 2,658
Joined on 10-12-2006

Post #: 53
Post ID: 26143
Reply to: 26140
Drama vs. Economics
Alex, whatever the standards and/or expectations are for steel plate for ship yards, customers for electrical connectors don't want them to start out corroded, starting at the wholesale/distributor level. So, manufacturers don't want an inventory of their finished products corroding, either, and they go out of their way to be sure this doesn't happen. I don't know the specifics of working with copper for the "hi-fi market", but it's easy to see there's not much in the way of pure copper connectors available, and I suppose this is because it's more profitable to work with and sell copper alloys ("eutectic" copper). Hard to believe there is a profitable yet un-tapped market for pure copper hi-fi connectors.


Best regards,
Paul S
11-28-2021 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
xandcg


Rio de Janeiro, BR.
Posts 218
Joined on 09-07-2014

Post #: 54
Post ID: 26587
Reply to: 26143
I give it up.
So, I give up of trying this cable construction experiment. I found some who already did a test with a similar construction and once a higher shielding material was placed it killed the cotton in oil magic, and it sounded like a "regular' shielded cable.

Thanks for the advise too.

Btw, Viborg has now pure solid silver power plugs.

E.g. http://www.viborgaudio.com/en/Product/a/chanpin/jianzhusheji/2021/0923/377.html



Think for yourself, do not be sheep.
07-29-2022 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
xandcg


Rio de Janeiro, BR.
Posts 218
Joined on 09-07-2014

Post #: 55
Post ID: 26840
Reply to: 26587
Signal Projects
A cable vendor that actually explain what they are doing... if that is BS or not, I can't tell.

https://signalprojects.com/technology/



Think for yourself, do not be sheep.
Page 3 of 3 (55 items) Select Pages:  « 1 2 3
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  Do not touch that used tonearm!..  Tonearm running-in...  Audio For Dummies ™  Forum     7  82177  01-30-2007
  »  New  Any good sounding AES/EBU interfaces out there?..  Better keep with AN cables...  Didital Things  Forum     53  429714  09-17-2007
  »  New  Purist Audio Design vs. Purist Audio Design..  Maybe we need phantom power?...  Audio Discussions  Forum     25  234587  04-06-2008
  »  New  The “Wet and Fuzzy” cable...  The “Wet and Fuzzy” cable....  Audio Discussions  Forum     0  15786  05-09-2008
  »  New  Cable Current Loading..  The Purist’s Problems...  Audio Discussions  Forum     5  37220  05-14-2008
  »  New  Chasing utopian better phono interconnect...  Did I miss something?...  Analog Playback Forum     6  110933  06-05-2008
  »  New  FM and … cables…..  Cables as Sound Shapers...  Off Air Audio Forum     4  45429  04-15-2009
  »  New  The BEST bass cable?..  Dialectic biased cable....  Audio Discussions  Forum     4  44996  04-22-2011
Home Page  |  Last 24Hours  | Search  |  SiteMap  | Questions or Problems | Copyright Note
The content of all messages within the Forums Copyright © by authors of the posts