| 
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                        
                                                         fiogf49gjkf0d 
		 RE Peralmusic soundfiles
  This is something that a Jacob Ganz wrote for NPR (my underlining):
 
 "I spoke again with Bob Ludwig, the mastering engineer quoted in the 
story, who has submitted "Mastered for iTunes" tracks to Apple. He says 
the company is simply providing mastering engineers with tools that 
allow them to see how songs mastered at 24 bits will clip (that is, 
distort audibly) when they go through the standardized AAC encoding 
process. That's been difficult to do in the past. Seeing the places 
where all lossy encoders creates clipping in the music gives engineers a
 reference for how to adjust the master recordings to avoid that 
distortion. The uncompressed files are then submitted to iTunes, which 
creates lossless versions before encoding the songs as 256 kpbs AAC 
files for sale in the iTunes store. (Through the testing process, Apple 
has even been submitting its encoded AAC files to mastering engineers to
 make sure the process hasn't created any unforeseen errors.)   
  Why
 is this significant? Because the fact that Apple retains the lossless 
versions of the high-quality studio masters means that iTunes, at any 
time it decides to, can begin selling higher-quality encodes, or even 
lossless files. If this story is, at bottom, about how the demands of 
consumers shift the balance between convenience and quality, then this 
new development is Apple's effort to allow humans to correct flaws in a 
very useful but imperfect technology. It does not mean that the company 
is locking its users into an inferior format." 
  If I am misparsing this gobbledygook please let me know. But the plain sense of it is that audio masterers have to remaster their finished product in order for it not to audibly clip in Itunes. So what is sent to Apple as a "lossless" file has already been altered in quite significant ways, all of which are invisible to the consumer. Nonetheless the consumer will be assured that this is the "lossless" file used to generate the Apple lossy file. Are we beginning to notice a pattern with the formerly estimable Mr Ludwig? Anyway your link says that the Bruckner soundfiles are Not preprocessed for ITunes. I guess you have to buy them to find out if they audibly clip.
  Here is another quote from Jordan Kahn at 9to5mac:
 
 "When Apple started pushing its “Mastered for iTunes” section
 of albums “specially tuned for higher fidelity sound,” it also 
published a white paper detailing new guidelines asking publishers to 
submit high-resolution 24-bit/96kHz files instead of the original CD 
masters for inclusion in the section. Many were under the impression 
that the 100 or so albums in the new section are sonically closer to the
 original CD source in comparison to your average AAC encode from 
iTunes. According to British mastering engineer Ian Shepherd, “null 
testing” proves that is simply not true.
 In fact, he proves a “vanilla” iTunes AAC encoding with default 
settings sounds closer to the original CD than songs that were 
specifically Mastered for iTunes. "
 
  What this suggests is that we have gotten to the point where "lossless file" is a completely meaningless term. 
 
                                                        
                                                        
                                                     |