| Search | Login/Register
   Home » Playback Listening » An unexplored way to deal with the sound/music perception (40 posts, 2 pages)
  Print Thread | 1st Post |  
Page 2 of 2 (40 items) Select Pages:  « 1 2
06-30-2011 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Kunashirsky


Russia-Japan-China
Posts 12
Joined on 06-30-2011

Post #: 26
Post ID: 16586
Reply to: 16584
Torsion technologies in medicine
fiogf49gjkf0d
With regards to the recognition of torsion technologies in medicine and safety. Call as an example of Russian medical company - IMEDIS. I had to deal with her ​​devices. There is a correlation with my hypothesis of music perception not only hearing but also other field of human systems.
These devices are very effective, but unfortunately the development of the principle they do not. Developers of devices is no longer alive (at the beginning of the century died). Improves only electronics. The company had to do with the Kremlin Politburo medicine in the 20th century.
With some of this company I've talked to in person. And the instrument of the century I have. As an experimental device.
                                                           -------------------------------- We have long arms (12 seats)






It is better to be first accordion on Kunashir, than seventh violin Moscow Philharmonic
06-30-2011 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
N-set
Gdansk, Poland
Posts 609
Joined on 01-07-2006

Post #: 27
Post ID: 16587
Reply to: 16583
TF
fiogf49gjkf0d
This is unfortunately +/- what I'd expect from torsion field followers.
Akimov and Shipov are two Russian "academics" behind the
very concept.



Cheers,
Jarek
STACORE
06-30-2011 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Kunashirsky


Russia-Japan-China
Posts 12
Joined on 06-30-2011

Post #: 28
Post ID: 16588
Reply to: 16584
Wafe ha ha ha .... resonance. i not know!!!
fiogf49gjkf0d
 Romy the Cat wrote:
Kunashirsky, I do not want to “estimate the remastered vinyl obtained by this technology”. Nether I want to “go to Page 8 of your site” or to any other page. It look like you have some kind of strong believes about some kind of things, so do I.

One of my believes is that we practice audio for themselves.  I mean the ideas that we have intended for nothing more than to server benefits of Sound in our own listening rooms. Whatever grandioso ideas you have and whatever capacitor you use to adjust the trajectories of Galaxies in Milky Way – all of it serve no more propose then to help to get from your own playback better sound. If you feel that your “inventions” are too universal to be confided to audio then, please, use other avenues to observe own “specialness”. This site is very consciously dedicated to “applied advanced audio and evolved music reproduction techniques”.

I do not know what kind sound you are getting in there but looking at some steps you made that I do know, looking at the ridicules crap that you are playing in your room and looking at your extremely primitive views about sound practice I feel +do not have any interest to what you do. I am sure that you are a tremendously talented man but again:  whatever you do, let it to benefit Sound of you own listening room only. So far I did not see are right signs that wood makes me to express any interest to whatever you proclaims your invention.


I have no room in rezonnansov. And the lab. And in the warehouse, either. This matter what I have advanced technology that eliminates standing waves. Fundamentally eliminate them. As a physical phenomenon. So I did not tune !        I am doing and trudge from a high of life.
Sorry I do not want to argue. In the end boss is always right.      Even if it is a complete idiot.



It is better to be first accordion on Kunashir, than seventh violin Moscow Philharmonic
06-30-2011 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Kunashirsky


Russia-Japan-China
Posts 12
Joined on 06-30-2011

Post #: 29
Post ID: 16589
Reply to: 16587
Audio inventon Mr. Akimov - LOL!!!
fiogf49gjkf0d
 N-set wrote:
This is unfortunately +/- what I'd expect from torsion field followers.
Akimov and Shipov are two Russian "academics" behind the
very concept.


Excuse me, can I dumb. I ask: What does Mr. Akimov IMET to audio? Or Mr. Thorns? They practice?
Eggheads do not like talkers. All swing, but not to move a finger. They are lazy and talkers. With his arms growing out of ... asshole. Zhopo rukie.
It's not my style - I practice. I appreciate it. I respect the people's business.



It is better to be first accordion on Kunashir, than seventh violin Moscow Philharmonic
06-30-2011 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,049
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 30
Post ID: 16590
Reply to: 16587
I do not like all of it….
fiogf49gjkf0d
 N-set wrote:
This is unfortunately +/- what I'd expect from torsion field followers.
Akimov and Shipov are two Russian "academics" behind the
very concept.
 I do not know who Akimov and Shipov are and I do not know what the “concept” is.  From what I can observe what Kunashirsky say and what he does (as little as it possible to see over internet) the problem in there is not with “concept” but in very specific mental interpretation of reality by very given individual. Again, it all might be not total BS. For sure his talk is unfortunately foolish but it might be real phenomena behind it. Being what I call “disturbed” Kunashirsky might have hyper sensitivity to some state of matter that escape normal detection - in fact I have seen it with some people. Still, Kunashirsky interpretation of causality and results is beyond any level what it would be worth to observe, at least in my estimation. Still, the “bad Kunashirsky” does not discredit the whole field. In fact some of the aspects of Kunashirsky are very useful and very valid (like space ordination of elements) for sure all it come with the large dose of Kunashirsky himself that has very little value…

I do not know what torsion field followers are and why suddenly torsion field get so much publicity at my site. I mention the torsion fields only as an EXAMPLE of other ways of thinking and I got punished by Kunashirsky flooding my site with stories how he was abused by KGB… I do not like all of it…. But as long as it confines to one thread I think I will go along with it.

The Cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
06-30-2011 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
N-set
Gdansk, Poland
Posts 609
Joined on 01-07-2006

Post #: 31
Post ID: 16591
Reply to: 16590
Concepts and behinds
fiogf49gjkf0d
In science, people organize the perception of reality using various theoretical concepts.
One of such concepts is e.g. the electromagnetic field, which very successfully
explains some class of perceived phenomena. The main people behind this concept
are Faraday and Maxwell. Apart from explaining and predicting a variety of phenomena,
the concept of electromagnetic field has produced enormous variety of practical applications.
 
Another concept with is that of the gravity field. It again explains a variety of phenomena,
different* from those explained by electromagnetuic field. the main people behind this concept
are Newton and Einstein.

Then a new concept in fundamental physics appeared -- that of a torsion field, which was supposed
to be a completely new, previously unknown type of field. In fact this type of field had been studied by
Einstein (seeking to unify electromagnetic and gravitational fields) and Cartan to name the biggest.
Unfortunately, the concept of the torsion field has not been successful as it has been impossible to proveably correlate
this theoretical concept with any observable phenomenon and it has been abandoned via Occam razor-type of reasoning...until
quite recently when two self-proclaimed(?) Russian academics Akimov and Shipov (and a group of
people around them) claimed to have theoretically generalized the concept of the torsion field and has even found
experimental evidence (=correlation between the theory and observations). Unfortunately nobody has been able
neither to repeat their calculations nor experiments and they've been dubbed scammers and their "science" a fraud.
This however has not stopped the torsion field followers
from going on and developing "applications" for their concept spanning an enormous range of phenomena (in an attempt to repeat
and surpass the success of the concept of electromagnetic field):
lowering copper conductivity, constructing flying saucers-type propulsions, telephaty, cancer healing, etc, etc. Again, unfortunately nobody
has been able to objectively confirm the claimed effects. Since the claimed range of phenomena "explained"
by the concept of torsion fields is so enormously wide, it's not surprising that some people apply it to audio.
 






Cheers,
Jarek
STACORE
06-30-2011 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,049
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 32
Post ID: 16593
Reply to: 16591
Cone on, get some perspective!
fiogf49gjkf0d
 N-set wrote:
In science, people organize the perception of reality using various theoretical concepts.
One of such concepts is e.g. the electromagnetic field, which very successfully
explains some class of perceived phenomena. The main people behind this concept
are Faraday and Maxwell. Apart from explaining and predicting a variety of phenomena,
the concept of electromagnetic field has produced enormous variety of practical applications.
 
Another concept with is that of the gravity field. It again explains a variety of phenomena,
different* from those explained by electromagnetuic field. the main people behind this concept
are Newton and Einstein.

Then a new concept in fundamental physics appeared -- that of a torsion field, which was supposed
to be a completely new, previously unknown type of field. In fact this type of field had been studied by
Einstein (seeking to unify electromagnetic and gravitational fields) and Cartan to name the biggest.
Unfortunately, the concept of the torsion field has not been successful as it has been impossible to proveably correlate
this theoretical concept with any observable phenomenon and it has been abandoned via Occam razor-type of reasoning...until
quite recently when two self-proclaimed(?) Russian academics Akimov and Shipov (and a group of
people around them) claimed to have theoretically generalized the concept of the torsion field and has even found
experimental evidence (=correlation between the theory and observations). Unfortunately nobody has been able
neither to repeat their calculations nor experiments and they've been dubbed scammers and their "science" a fraud.
This however has not stopped the torsion field followers
from going on and developing "applications" for their concept spanning an enormous range of phenomena (in an attempt to repeat
and surpass the success of the concept of electromagnetic field):
lowering copper conductivity, constructing flying saucers-type propulsions, telephaty, cancer healing, etc, etc. Again, unfortunately nobody
has been able to objectively confirm the claimed effects. Since the claimed range of phenomena "explained"
by the concept of torsion fields is so enormously wide, it's not surprising that some people apply it to audio. 

This is kind of funny and in way pitiable. Kunashirsky, who probably pop up at my site by searching the words “torsion fields” feels that is a greater inventor since Leonardo. You, hearing the phrase “torsion fields”, dive into a rage against torsion ideas, bringing quotes from teenager popular physics journals to back up your detestation of anything torsion. Interesting that no one beside you and Kunashirsky has any interest about torsion fields, the theory, practice, effect, history its…. If you can’t live without torsion then can you talk to him directly – I am sure he will be happy to debate it. My question is what it all has to do with my site? Do you have any evidence or ideas of using torsion fields for audio applications?  If not, then what we are talking about?  I have a slab of granite on my backyard, why don’t you talk how this slab impact Sound of a person on another side of the Earth. Cone on, get some perspective!


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
07-01-2011 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
N-set
Gdansk, Poland
Posts 609
Joined on 01-07-2006

Post #: 33
Post ID: 16595
Reply to: 16593
Playing dumb
fiogf49gjkf0d
You are a very funny guy Big Smile We finish this idiocy?





Cheers,
Jarek
STACORE
07-01-2011 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Kunashirsky


Russia-Japan-China
Posts 12
Joined on 06-30-2011

Post #: 34
Post ID: 16598
Reply to: 16595
Summary - Results of small talk:
fiogf49gjkf0d
Summary - Results of small talk:
1. You asked: Does the application of torsion waves in the audio? I will answer you: yes and showed the device for music.
2. You asked: is the theoretical foundation of their work? I answered yes and explained something about my long study of sound.
3. You have doubted - that decided to count dummy devices. Then I showed you a video of the laboratory where the music plays.
4 you said that pornographic video quality I'm busy with nonsense. Dear opponent! Believe that you are not worthy of more quality material. Since you have enough of my technical pornography on You Tube.

As a bonus, I attach a picture with a brief explanation of my concept.

Superlinear current amplifier with a frequency band from 0 Hz to 50 kHz. At its inlet and outlet channels are torsion energy decoders. This dramatically improves the dynamics of transformation - electricity, magnetism, acoustics, air pressure.
It is possible to insert the device and torsion in the amplifier. It will be a doomsday machine for skeptics. Terrifying Terminator. I was doing such - always a stunning effect.

 Stay on, alone with his mind Huge skeptic. I'm with you totally do not mind. In the end, I simply answer a few of your questions.
Course of the case can be made and business. But in business there is one rule - the skeptics and dogmatists pants (men without risk) - is doomed to failure. I finally had a good time in your esteemed company gentlemen. Alas, no time! Greetings, I'm sorry gentlemen - I expect great things.
 Goodbye. Yurich.


It is better to be first accordion on Kunashir, than seventh violin Moscow Philharmonic
07-01-2011 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,049
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 35
Post ID: 16599
Reply to: 16598
Well, you decided to follow up with summary, let deal with it.
fiogf49gjkf0d

 Kunashirsky wrote:
Summary - Results of small talk:
1. You asked: Does the application of torsion waves in the audio? I will answer you: yes and showed the device for music.

The application of torsion waves in the audio is never was subject of judgment. I know that posting here N-set is violently against it. In contrary to him I have no position or opinion on the subject. I do admit that in some cases we do have in audio (only in audio) some influences of extra-sensual forces or the forces that do not have grip yet. Are they torsion waves or any other waves? I do not know. You unquestionably have a great advantage to judge trios things over all of us as you has a device, a tangible devise that take advantage of torsion waves, at least what you report.  However, I very much question your judgments in evaluation and interpreting of the results you have. Try to understand that it is not the torsion waves are at question but the interpretation of your mind the torsion waves vision and it application in audio. I personally fee very uncomfortable with very many aspects of your thinking. torsion waves is complex subject but you slip at so many very simplistic subjects that I personally do not extend you credit to assess the torsion waves applications in audio.

 Kunashirsky wrote:
2. You asked: is the theoretical foundation of their work? I answered yes and explained something about my long study of sound.

Kunashirsky, I did not see your “long study of sound.” I did see some delusional comments from you about sounds but they were at very infant level. I do not particularly care about theoretical foundations. I did ask about you Russian people who I know and who ARE very serious physicists. Sorry, but they were laughing about your theoretical foundations … I do not insist that they are right but what I heard from you (in your videos) make me to concur with them.

 Kunashirsky wrote:
3. You have doubted - that decided to count dummy devices. Then I showed you a video of the laboratory where the music plays.

Sorry, what you played was not music but garbage that you have to be ashamed of.

 Kunashirsky wrote:
4 you said that pornographic video quality I'm busy with nonsense. Dear opponent! Believe that you are not worthy of more quality material. Since you have enough of my technical pornography on You Tube.

Nope, I did not say anything about “video quality”. If you geniuses mind is not able to “possess” what I said then twisted it into pornographic video quality then in that mind would be not only  torsion waves but also mold and mildew…

 Kunashirsky wrote:
Stay on, alone with his mind Huge skeptic. I'm with you totally do not mind. In the end, I simply answer a few of your questions. Course of the case can be made and business. But in business there is one rule - the skeptics and dogmatists pants (men without risk) - is doomed to failure. I finally had a good time in your esteemed company gentlemen. Alas, no time! Greetings, I'm sorry gentlemen - I expect great things.

I generally very glad that I am very far from whatever business you run. Since my site is invested with such subordinate to your intellect people then would you be so kind to avoid my site in future?

The Cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
07-01-2011 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Kunashirsky


Russia-Japan-China
Posts 12
Joined on 06-30-2011

Post #: 36
Post ID: 16600
Reply to: 16599
Saenara
fiogf49gjkf0d
When physicists about (my black humor)
When your 10 famous physicists will make a music playing power amplifier? Roma, I shake their sweaty hands, steeped in over masturbation devices. Invite me necessarily Romm on this amazing event. This intresnee even than Americans to the moon landing ...

Of course Rommy.
I Practices as min - with 7 years of work in this naprvlenie. Any job is a business. Otherwise there is no sense in it. Free art - it is also a difficult job when you meet stupid idiots. (for our skeptic). But I am mindful of Christ, I try to be fair and restrained. Explaining the facts and basics. Otherwise inevitable hell idiocy of rejection and misunderstanding.
So I said goodbye and left. Saenara



It is better to be first accordion on Kunashir, than seventh violin Moscow Philharmonic
07-01-2011 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
N-set
Gdansk, Poland
Posts 609
Joined on 01-07-2006

Post #: 37
Post ID: 16601
Reply to: 16599
Physicists
fiogf49gjkf0d
 Romy the Cat wrote:

I did ask about you Russian people who I know and who ARE very serious physicists.



Interesting.
What are they working in? Can I get to know them somehow?
I'm always happy to make new contacts in the field. Seriously.





Cheers,
Jarek
STACORE
07-01-2011 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
zako
Posts 85
Joined on 05-25-2008

Post #: 38
Post ID: 16610
Reply to: 16601
String along with me..
fiogf49gjkf0d
Is any of this field theory connected with STRING theory,,But on a larger scale???
07-05-2011 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Kunashirsky


Russia-Japan-China
Posts 12
Joined on 06-30-2011

Post #: 39
Post ID: 16633
Reply to: 16610
Record at Boston Symphony Orchestra
fiogf49gjkf0d
 zako wrote:
Is any of this field theory connected with STRING theory,,But on a larger scale???


I would become a felt boot! -

Strings!? - Yes, there's a string - this orchestra.
While writing this somewhat dull in artistic terms. But as a fact to study the perfect example.

Unfortunately in my vinyl was found only one record at Boston Symphony Orchestra. 1967 I think. Nevertheless, I think that over the years the scene has changed little speakers? Although I am not strong in architectural history. Mauger has already built a new scene. Nevertheless, perhaps someone will be curious about technology in my Chaykosvky torsion remastering.

Yes, I certainly knew about some strings conversation. But let's I'll be very blunt. To all eminent physicists were satisfied?
 I left the discussion - it my PS




It is better to be first accordion on Kunashir, than seventh violin Moscow Philharmonic
07-05-2011 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,049
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 40
Post ID: 16634
Reply to: 16633
Mormon’s magic underwear….
fiogf49gjkf0d
I decided to terminate the Kunashirsky account as he unfortunately keeps coming back. I figured that Kunashirsky is too good for this site. I would make a service to humanity if I prevent such a great intellect as Kunashirsky to waste his valuable time with simple primitive mortals of this site. Anyhow, that all reminds me an old joke: how many smart engineers needed to change a light bulb? The answer is: one, a smart engineer knows that the Earth is spinning, oops sorry, not spinning but torsioning….

The Cat

PS: The file converted from LP posted by Kunashirsky does have OK Sound, even the LP playback is auditabley very bad. Still, the funny part is where people usually put a name of soloist Kunashirsky put his own name…


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Page 2 of 2 (40 items) Select Pages:  « 1 2
Home Page  |  Last 24Hours  | Search  |  SiteMap  | Questions or Problems | Copyright Note
The content of all messages within the Forums Copyright © by authors of the posts