Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site

Kunashirsky wrote:

Summary - Results of small talk: 1. You asked: Does the application of torsion waves in the audio? I will answer you: yes and showed the device for music.

The application of torsion waves in the audio is never was subject of judgment. I know that posting here N-set is violently against it. In contrary to him I have no position or opinion on the subject. I do admit that in some cases we do have in audio (only in audio) some influences of extra-sensual forces or the forces that do not have grip yet. Are they torsion waves or any other waves? I do not know. You unquestionably have a great advantage to judge trios things over all of us as you has a device, a tangible devise that take advantage of torsion waves, at least what you report.  However, I very much question your judgments in evaluation and interpreting of the results you have. Try to understand that it is not the torsion waves are at question but the interpretation of your mind the torsion waves vision and it application in audio. I personally fee very uncomfortable with very many aspects of your thinking. torsion waves is complex subject but you slip at so many very simplistic subjects that I personally do not extend you credit to assess the torsion waves applications in audio.

Kunashirsky wrote:

2. You asked: is the theoretical foundation of their work? I answered yes and explained something about my long study of sound.

Kunashirsky, I did not see your “long study of sound.” I did see some delusional comments from you about sounds but they were at very infant level. I do not particularly care about theoretical foundations. I did ask about you Russian people who I know and who ARE very serious physicists. Sorry, but they were laughing about your theoretical foundations … I do not insist that they are right but what I heard from you (in your videos) make me to concur with them.

Kunashirsky wrote:

3. You have doubted - that decided to count dummy devices. Then I showed you a video of the laboratory where the music plays.

Sorry, what you played was not music but garbage that you have to be ashamed of.

Kunashirsky wrote:

4 you said that pornographic video quality I'm busy with nonsense. Dear opponent! Believe that you are not worthy of more quality material. Since you have enough of my technical pornography on You Tube.

Nope, I did not say anything about “video quality”. If you geniuses mind is not able to “possess” what I said then twisted it into pornographic video quality then in that mind would be not only  torsion waves but also mold and mildew…

Kunashirsky wrote:

Stay on, alone with his mind Huge skeptic. I'm with you totally do not mind. In the end, I simply answer a few of your questions. Course of the case can be made and business. But in business there is one rule - the skeptics and dogmatists pants (men without risk) - is doomed to failure. I finally had a good time in your esteemed company gentlemen. Alas, no time! Greetings, I'm sorry gentlemen - I expect great things.

I generally very glad that I am very far from whatever business you run. Since my site is invested with such subordinate to your intellect people then would you be so kind to avoid my site in future?

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site