|
|
Romy the Cat
Boston, MA
Posts 10,461
Joined on 05-28-2004
|
Post #:
|
4
|
|
Post ID:
|
29680
|
|
Reply to:
|
29675
|
|
|
|
Well, I have a different take
|
|
|
|
|
NBC, I’m sorry, but you’re way off.
First, there is no GSC “community” with predefined listening priorities. Everyone operates independently, and that’s exactly how it should be in a field like audio.
Second, what you’re doing isn’t really about audio—at least not in the way I understand it. You’re evaluating various pieces of equipment and scattered ideas without understanding the purpose of listening, the methods involved, the expressive intent, the criteria for success or failure, or the overall experiential workflow behind the listening process. Then you take a list of unrelated products and people, group them together, and assume they’re relevant just because they loosely align with audio. It’s like buying guns, fishing rods, or non-magnetic screwdrivers instead of speaker drivers—they’re equally irrelevant to practicing audio - and to claim that you're fishing rods have audio value.
NBC, my site is not Rob Report, and it’s not the idiotic “what’s the best.com” with a community of a clearly diagnosable morons. People who don’t understand what they’re doing and are trying forcefully interact with the subject bring no value to me.
Don’t chase this. What all those people do in audio is mostly a self-serving perpose—a psychological projection wrapped in shallow virtue signaling, often coming from people who lack even basic self-awareness and introspection.
"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
|
|
|