| Search | Login/Register
   Home » Musical Discussions » ... and some Bruckner buzz (32 posts, 2 pages)
  Print Thread | 1st Post |  
Page 2 of 2 (32 items) Select Pages:  « 1 2
03-07-2025 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Paul S
San Diego, California, USA
Posts 2,744
Joined on 10-12-2006

Post #: 26
Post ID: 28004
Reply to: 27967
Celibidache/Munich PO, B9, Berlin, '81

It seems like Celibidache’s fans and critics agree broadly on what he is doing but they disagree wildly about whether the results are special or simply too much. As I have shared, I am fairly new to Bruckner, and this was my first time listening closely to Celibidache through an “entire” symphony. Yes, he’s slow, all right, but this performance is live, and the slow tempo works for me here, in terms of the way it loads the venue, also in terms of the interplay and the development of the many threads in this fascinating and awe-inspiring symphony. C actually uses the slow pace to effectively “create space”, which for me only reinforces a sense I have had about Bruckner’s symphonies since I first really heard them, that they are “Celestial”, also that Bruckner is reverent. David Hurwitz has said that Germans like “secular worship”, and he says that they find this in Bruckner’s Music, and that Celibidache feeds into and off this phenomenon.  Speaking for myself, more power to Celibidache on this score; for me, it’s a plus, as he really puts me “in the mood” with this B9. I am glad I added this performance to my B9 collection; however, I offer a caveat: The CD here is labeled “Exclusive EX92T23/24”, which includes Celibidache’s B4 with Stuttgart Rundfunk, and this 9th. As near as I can tell, this CD is a bootleg, with scant information provided with the discs, and there is no noted provenance. The level 1 sound is not good, but I get most of the Music that matters. I wish I had spent more time filtering the many choices for Celibidache’s B9 performances and recordings, as there are many similar but not the same; but I’m glad I got to hear it via my Big Rig.


Paul S

03-08-2025 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
dady
Posts 10
Joined on 07-28-2005

Post #: 27
Post ID: 28008
Reply to: 28004
Celibidache a Genious
Hello everyone, the series of that Rundfunk symphony from Stuttgart and I think they are from a different label than the one he used when he was last married with his own orchestra here were from EMI and already had the label of his Zen Buddhism. The other day I received those from the Deutsche Gramophon from Stuttgart and I have only heard the octave which has a tempo that is quite slower than the usual ones. But something that the great Sergiu did was to thin out the music so that it could be experienced in all its extension, both in the volumes as well as in the emphasis of making one group of instruments shine over another. Enjoy it, my friend.
03-08-2025 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Paul S
San Diego, California, USA
Posts 2,744
Joined on 10-12-2006

Post #: 28
Post ID: 28009
Reply to: 28008
Re: This Celibidache B9
I want to add that this iteration of the Munich PO is very capable, and - important to the Music here - they completely buy in to Celibidache's concept. The playing is magnificent not because it is showy but because it actually manifests as C's idea.

Paul S
03-09-2025 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,316
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 29
Post ID: 28020
Reply to: 28008
Yes, he is in Bruckner music
 dady wrote:
Hello everyone, the series of that Rundfunk symphony from Stuttgart and I think they are from a different label than the one he used when he was last married with his own orchestra here were from EMI and already had the label of his Zen Buddhism. The other day I received those from the Deutsche Gramophon from Stuttgart and I have only heard the octave which has a tempo that is quite slower than the usual ones. But something that the great Sergiu did was to thin out the music so that it could be experienced in all its extension, both in the volumes as well as in the emphasis of making one group of instruments shine over another. Enjoy it, my friend.
I do not particularly feel that Celibidache was a genius but I certainly feel that he was genius in Anton Bruckner. I heard some of his recordings of none Brucner and it was not so special. Some of the things he did with Bruckner are completely transcendent. For instance with all my appreciation of B7 I almost felt that the 3rd movement is so light and so stupidly dancing that it should not be in that symphony. Celibidache in one of his recordings completely reversed my view. He typically plays slow but in that specific performance, it was probably  63367842 times slower than he typically does it. And it was absolutely majestic. That stupid repetitive nature kind of gun because you do not remember what was 10 minutes ago, and that whole moment was like a hole independent symphony is that you wish never stop. I remember when the first time hurt I was mesmerized and I truly feel it was absolutely new world in the Bruckner musicology. But I need to admit, is it I generally have very heavy bias for music play significantly slower then it is. I even have my Denon DJ CD player, that sounds horribly but that allowed to adjust is the speed of the play. Sometimes I'm deeply intentionally play some music mach, mach slower. I even fantasized to have an options to reduce the speed of CD playing resolve to reducing the pitch...


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
03-12-2025 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
dady
Posts 10
Joined on 07-28-2005

Post #: 30
Post ID: 28024
Reply to: 28020
Celibidache and the tempos...
 Romy the Cat wrote:
 dady wrote:
Hello everyone, the series of that Rundfunk symphony from Stuttgart and I think they are from a different label than the one he used when he was last married with his own orchestra here were from EMI and already had the label of his Zen Buddhism. The other day I received those from the Deutsche Gramophon from Stuttgart and I have only heard the octave which has a tempo that is quite slower than the usual ones. But something that the great Sergiu did was to thin out the music so that it could be experienced in all its extension, both in the volumes as well as in the emphasis of making one group of instruments shine over another. Enjoy it, my friend.
I do not particularly feel that Celibidache was a genius but I certainly feel that he was genius in Anton Bruckner. I heard some of his recordings of none Brucner and it was not so special. Some of the things he did with Bruckner are completely transcendent. For instance with all my appreciation of B7 I almost felt that the 3rd movement is so light and so stupidly dancing that it should not be in that symphony. Celibidache in one of his recordings completely reversed my view. He typically plays slow but in that specific performance, it was probably  63367842 times slower than he typically does it. And it was absolutely majestic. That stupid repetitive nature kind of gun because you do not remember what was 10 minutes ago, and that whole moment was like a hole independent symphony is that you wish never stop. I remember when the first time hurt I was mesmerized and I truly feel it was absolutely new world in the Bruckner musicology. But I need to admit, is it I generally have very heavy bias for music play significantly slower then it is. I even have my Denon DJ CD player, that sounds horribly but that allowed to adjust is the speed of the play. Sometimes I'm deeply intentionally play some music mach, mach slower. I even fantasized to have an options to reduce the speed of CD playing resolve to reducing the pitch...


Hello Romy, thank you for being here. The marriage between Celibidache and the maestro Bruckner is one of the most transcendental. I believe it has put the utmost emphasis on unraveling and unraveling the music of the genius from San Florián.I don't feel qualified to make a comparative assessment, given that recordings are never made with the same standards, neither acoustically nor technically. Thus, the microphone positions, their balance, the desire and ability of the sound engineer, and their artistic sensitivity, which ultimately will also establish a bias in the production. Finally, other factors that I don't know in greater depth make it impossible to establish an objective comparison.Even less so for a layman like me to have the audacity to make a judgment.However, as with the choice of a wife, I have liked the three I have had, and they were different. Because they also interacted with me during different stages of my life. I want to focus this entire comment on the subjective appreciation of Bruckner's symphonies by none other than the greatest conductors.Regarding speed, I think the time has come to be able to lower tempos without changing the key. You'd have to load the information from the CDs and work with a computer. I haven't done this myself, but reading your post makes me wonder if I should do it. I believe there are some DJ players that have been able to do this for a long time, although I'm not sure if the fidelity for which they were designed is powerful enough to avoid introducing distortion. Best regards to you and to the occasional members who read this post.
03-12-2025 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,316
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 31
Post ID: 28025
Reply to: 28024
Slower is better, even my wife agree with this...

Honestly, I do not think that Ci had any privilege recordings techniques. I reportedly he hate all of these things and some of his recordings always was recorded as bootlegs. I don't know if it is true but it is what people say. Regarding the pich. Yes you can use some DJ equipment but you will be able to get proper sound only after analog will be output. I experimented with this and my 16-bit d/a converter doesn't lock to get digital stream out. It locks but it does not work stable. So, in My views advantage to lower the pitch get greatly overridden by very bad da converters the consumer DJs machines have inside. 

All this obsession with pich I developed somewhere in 2005-2006. I heard of recording of small German orchestra which was tuned significantly lower than typical A440. I did not know about it is but for whatever reason that recording give me some kind of strange pleasure. And it was not darkness but some kind of very strange scenarities which give me pleasure. I was playing with different peach of orchestra recorded at 440 and I discovered that the most pleasure I am getting when I am somewhere in the middle of A330s. The sound become more philosophical, it's hard to explain in words what it is 

I do not think today orchestra's can tuned to mid 330s. I think bras and woodwings need to be redesigned. But it is not area where I am expert. I know that baroque orchestras are playing at 415, but I do not have the same sense of peacefulness as I have at mid 330s. I do not play any music now with slower peach. However, the ability of the whole playback to react to change of the pitch is very important characteristic. You can have one playback and you slightly change the speed of the records from 33.3 and you will not detect any difference. Another playback will highlight this change very aggressively. Now, try to figure out what does it mean....

In terms of the slowness, there are very few conductors and very few orchestras who can handle it. It's required such remarkable taste and discipline for musicians and such a amazing talent for a conductor to be able to put it all together, that only few of them succeed. One way or other I would like everything played as slow as possible. If it is good music and a good performance then I wish it just would never stop and as long as it takes the better to me.


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
03-31-2025 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
steverino
Posts 378
Joined on 05-23-2009

Post #: 32
Post ID: 28104
Reply to: 28025
Doesn't that go without saying????
Slower is better, even my wife agree with this...

I would just timidly note that there is a difference between a slightly reverberant large hall and the average home listening room.
Page 2 of 2 (32 items) Select Pages:  « 1 2
Home Page  |  Last 24Hours  | Search  |  SiteMap  | Questions or Problems | Copyright Note
The content of all messages within the Forums Copyright © by authors of the posts