| Search | Login/Register
   Home » Horn-Loaded Speakers» Macondo 3.0 (52 posts, 3 pages)
  Print Thread | 1st Post |  
Page 3 of 3 (52 items) Select Pages:  « 1 2 3
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  My new “New” listening room, 2024..  That is not enough efforts in this direction....  Audio Discussions  Forum     31  18254  05-08-2024
07-16-2023 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Bill
Kensington, NH
Posts 117
Joined on 03-15-2010

Post #: 51
Post ID: 27189
Reply to: 27186
1year gone
I worked on the Dannoy's for about a year, first with the Vitavox bass driver, then using two tannoy red 10's using only the cone for the second unit to improve volume and bass reproduction. Changed out amplifiers, used original, English new knockoffs, and my trinnov altitude prepro, but could never get back To what he had for those two weeks. So returned the cabinets and charged him with rebuilding the speakers to his original configuration to see if it was a fluke. Maybe after he finishes his latest project.

As far as Romy's delay, he is actually using a Yamaha unit, which actually is supposed to mimic the delay, decay times and frequency changes of the hall sound from various concert halls. Yamaha actually went around to various concert halls, jazz veneues, etc., and recorded the Hall effect, then used that information to try to mimic what one hears in various concert halls.

What stereo can't do is give that concert Hall effect, melding all of the reverberation into the front channels. What we hear in a concert hall is actually only 80 to less than 20% of the actual artists, depending where one sits, and the rest is Hall effect. I used a similar system years ago to good effect, but with the trinnov using Auro 3D, which extracts the hall sound from the recording if there, and sends it to the surround(sorry I meant Hall effect) channels. Unhappily multimike recording stand out in worse quality. Auro 3D also does a superb decoding of 5.1 track sacd recordings. It is far superior to Dolby, and dts.

You don,t need great equipment for the hall channels, just good. If you have a couple or a few speakers, and maybe a receiver or prepro with Dolby or dts d3coding, and a preamp two channel out from your main preamp, try it out. Even better, get a Yamaha decoder like Romy, or a receiver wit Auro 3D like me, and enjoy. No more listening through a door or window.
07-16-2023 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Paul S
San Diego, California, USA
Posts 2,658
Joined on 10-12-2006

Post #: 52
Post ID: 27190
Reply to: 27188
Toilet Paper
I just remembered that Haralanov and I discussed at length the merits of "mechanical filters" vs. electronic filters. We also agreed that a tweeter can sound much better when it's nested in a larger paper cone.

Best regards,
Paul S
Page 3 of 3 (52 items) Select Pages:  « 1 2 3
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  My new “New” listening room, 2024..  That is not enough efforts in this direction....  Audio Discussions  Forum     31  18254  05-08-2024
Home Page  |  Last 24Hours  | Search  |  SiteMap  | Questions or Problems | Copyright Note
The content of all messages within the Forums Copyright © by authors of the posts