| Search | Login/Register
   Home » Playback Listening » Accuracy vs. Musicality (and YMMV) (53 posts, 3 pages)
  Print Thread | 1st Post |  
Page 3 of 3 (53 items) Select Pages:  « 1 2 3
09-21-2024 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,239
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 51
Post ID: 27601
Reply to: 27600
Isn't it all about a regular creativity?

This is very interesting subject and my position about it very much not orthodox. Yes from certain perspective high end are there might be observed in context of evolved music listening experiences. In my view it is very surface point of view. I have plenty of people with whom we interact about very deep music listening experiences but over the years I never even ask them what playback they have, I do not even know if they practice audio in any sense. What is particular interesting that when I stress some specific points which might be observed only from a perspective of high-end audio they are completely with me or at least understand what I'm talking about. 


I am not elso in a complete agreement with that position above that it has something to do with love of technology. It of course might be, but not necessaraly necessary. 


I certainly not to pretend that my position would be some kind of universal and this is strongly my take on subject. I would point out to you my signature from the Friedrich. Before typewriter invention he was writing his work by the hands but when typewriter come to the existence he begin to type. In few years he observed by act of typing in the structured format, which typewriter demands, change the way how he began to think. There is his quote come from. I think it is very similar, at least to me, in regards of audio and music. I have an interest in certain musical expressionism and for me audio  is an invention of that proverbial typewriter, in order my thoughts be developed in a format that I approve. It is sort of a reverse engineering of my own consciousness and rendered by the means of application of audio algorithms.




"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
09-21-2024 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Paul S
San Diego, California, USA
Posts 2,699
Joined on 10-12-2006

Post #: 52
Post ID: 27603
Reply to: 27601
The Thread That Joins Us
I hope we all believe and support the idea that "it's a free country", and anyone might freely express whatever they want with their audio pursuits. The topic of this thread might have been anything, but it is "Accuracy vs. Musicality (and YMMV)", to mine that particular, long-beleaguered topic. I suppose we usually pretty much beat any topic to death here, but the idea of objectives going in is fair game in this thread, I think, and it certainly helps to put various viewpoints into some context. I am glad that Romy created a new thread to jab "the industry" in this context, also glad he pointed out that there is not only nothing wrong with buying gear but added it is the sense of what one is doing that creates the atmosphere one breathes and inhabits while indulging in what is fundamentally a hobby for most of us. I don't remember audio being in Maslow's Heirarchy of Needs.

Paul S
12-28-2024 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Paul S
San Diego, California, USA
Posts 2,699
Joined on 10-12-2006

Post #: 53
Post ID: 27812
Reply to: 27603
Live vs. (Re)produced
Ideas abound regarding how close we can come to a live musical event with our hi-fi equipment. There was a time when I bought into the idea of bringing live-sounding jazz into my home, and I built up a nice record collection while listening to jazz, rock, and musicals with my big Fulton (FMI) speakers driven by my first SS amp, a Sony TA-1130 integrated. Pretty sure these were the last speakers I heard demo'd where I wanted simply to duplicate in my home the sound I heard in the salon. It was a long time ago. Looking back, I had no idea at the time how "good" that amp was, and it was not only my first SS amp but it was also my last SS amp for many years, until I found the Marantz MA-9S2s I have used since 2013. Over the years, my own course of "Hi-fi evolution" has involved adapting my system to bring me more and more Music of my choice, an ongoing attempt to hear and relate to more Music, and "bigger" Music in particular, with an emphasis on what I find to be Great Performances of Great Works. Something funny to me is that I have had so many "meh" experiences listening to live music, particulary orchestral and opera. Not to be snobby, but Great Performances are where you find them, and I have to admit that my own focus of listening to Great Music is via my hi-fi. So, shoot me. I talked about Musical Potency as a way to talk about building a system that can "do" Big Works for me. If, say, Bruckner has a 110 dB range, then I like to have something like that. Does this mean I think my hi-fi sounds like a 110 piece orchestra? It does not; forget about it.

Paul S
Page 3 of 3 (53 items) Select Pages:  « 1 2 3
Home Page  |  Last 24Hours  | Search  |  SiteMap  | Questions or Problems | Copyright Note
The content of all messages within the Forums Copyright © by authors of the posts