Romy The Cat's Home Page
About
Site Manifesto
Site Copyright
Site Surveys
Site Statistics
Site Map
Site Support Forum
Current
24-Hours Site Activities
Current Visitors
News/Events
Classical Music News
NPR Classical Music Programs
Classical Music Events in Boston
Forums
Audio Knowledge Tree ™
Musical Discussions
Playback Listening Discussions
General Audio Discussions
Horn-Loaded Speakers Discussions
Analog Playback Discussions
Digital Audio Discussions
Off Air Audio Discussions
Audio For Dummies™ Discussions
Audio Industry "News" Discussions
Melquiades Amplifier Discussions
Most Active Topics
Unanswered Topics
Site Support Forum
Playback
Romy's "Audio Rules"
Melquiades DSET Amplifier
Macondo Acoustic System
End of Life Phonostage
"Over 8.500 words about my playback"
Visitors
Members
Edit My Profile
View My Topics
Unread Topics
Subscribed Topics
Non-Members
Create Site Membership
Non-Members New Topics Notification
Log-In/Log-Out
Forgot my Account?
Performances Exchange (Dead)
Components Exchange (Dead)
Satire
Trade
Audio Demoronizator AD-1
My Audio Leftovers
Links
Search
Forums Search
Google Search
Contact
Contact Romy The Cat?
Is it REALLY Important?
Ok, contact Romy the CaT
|
Search
|
Login/Register
Home
»
Didital Things
»
Tidal’s Music Streaming Service (3 posts, 1 page)
Print Thread
|
1st Post
|
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
Select Pages:
11-04-2014
Post does not mapped to
Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat
Boston, MA
Posts 10,182
Joined on 05-28-2004
Post #:
1
Post ID:
21303
Reply to:
21303
Tidal’s Music Streaming Service
fiogf49gjkf0d
A quick look at the Dally Audiophile web site suggest that anybody mention the new Tidal’s Music Streaming Service. That is a new 16/44.1 Streaming Service that the call "High Fidelity streaming service" by subscription only. There is nothing wrong with it but for whatever reason I am very skeptical. The question is: where those people will be getting the material. The claim 20K recordings including the catalogs of some major labels. So, do you think that DG, EMI, Sony and the rest of then give to them access to their 44K muster dubs. Not to mention that they mostly recorded in 48X and any 44X dubs would be garbage to begin with? A am sure it is not the case and the honorable Tidal people just ripped a pile of CDs, in best cases, witch defeats all purpose. I said in "best cases" because I know that behind the curtain of those companies are industry people and for them to cheat, deceive and to lie is a second nature. Since there is no regulated digital hygiene control in audio industry and the stupid audio consumers have no listening integrity and will buy anything I can give you an absolute assurance that is a few week somebody will discover that "High Fidelity streaming service" source MP3 files or does own DSP application to hide the source. So, I am subscribe the new as skeptic and feel that it is not necessary service.
"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
02-27-2015
Post does not mapped to
Knowledge Tree
xandcg
Rio de Janeiro, BR.
Posts 218
Joined on 09-07-2014
Post #:
2
Post ID:
21570
Reply to:
21303
Qobuz.
fiogf49gjkf0d
Romy,
I don't understand all hype around the Tidal service, like a saint graal or something, since it's not new at all (high resolution audio streaming). There are Qobuz (also a store) doing that for a few years. Most of the titles from them seems to be reliable but when Zaz launched the 'Recto Verso' album they sell a 24/192 (or 24/88-96, can't remember now) version which was nothing more than the 44/16 after some machinery. But to be fair they removed that one a week later. I know that fact just because I know one person who bought and had a look on the file in a DAW.
http://www.qobuz.com
Cheers.
Think for yourself, do not be sheep.
03-01-2015
Post does not mapped to
Knowledge Tree
steverino
Posts 367
Joined on 05-23-2009
Post #:
3
Post ID:
21573
Reply to:
21303
Not a bad thing but still an obstacle course
fiogf49gjkf0d
I think conceptually it would be great if everything were streamed even at CD levels. For 90% or more of listeners that would be an improvement. Given the wide scale manipulations in the remasterings being done by the iphone listening staff at the remaining labels, it is quite possible that a needledrop from an existing record might be a better listening experience though. At least the record has mastering constraints that are waved off in digital land.
At best CD level or higher streaming may make a difference if it is sent to a reasonable quality server but how typical is that? Most people listen most of the time on their mobile and that may include the people with the decent music servers. It seems like a valid niche market but that begs the question as to how all these streamers stay in business? Given the financial problems already evident in some of them I guess the question is being answered.
It does seem as if we are in a situation somewhat like the old quad sound where the equipment has capabilities that most users ignore. Almost all DACs , players and servers can play higher res files of some kind. Even DVD players can do that. Yet a tiny percentage use the feature or are even aware of it. It seems that folks in pop music at least who are interested in a non digital file sound are mainly gravitating back to the LP rather than rushing to the latest digital incarnation. If the streamers are dependent on classical and jazz then they might as well fold up now.
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
Select Pages:
Home Page
|
Last 24Hours
|
Search
|
SiteMap
|
Questions or Problems
|
Copyright Note
The content of all messages within the Forums Copyright © by authors of the posts