Romy The Cat's Home Page
About
Site Manifesto
Site Copyright
Site Surveys
Site Statistics
Site Map
Site Support Forum
Current
24-Hours Site Activities
Current Visitors
News/Events
Classical Music News
NPR Classical Music Programs
Classical Music Events in Boston
Forums
Audio Knowledge Tree ™
Musical Discussions
Playback Listening Discussions
General Audio Discussions
Horn-Loaded Speakers Discussions
Analog Playback Discussions
Digital Audio Discussions
Off Air Audio Discussions
Audio For Dummies™ Discussions
Audio Industry "News" Discussions
Melquiades Amplifier Discussions
Most Active Topics
Unanswered Topics
Site Support Forum
Playback
Romy's "Audio Rules"
Melquiades DSET Amplifier
Macondo Acoustic System
End of Life Phonostage
"Over 8.500 words about my playback"
Visitors
Members
Edit My Profile
View My Topics
Unread Topics
Subscribed Topics
Non-Members
Create Site Membership
Non-Members New Topics Notification
Log-In/Log-Out
Forgot my Account?
Performances Exchange (Dead)
Components Exchange (Dead)
Satire
Trade
Audio Demoronizator AD-1
My Audio Leftovers
Links
Search
Forums Search
Google Search
Contact
Contact Romy The Cat?
Is it REALLY Important?
Ok, contact Romy the CaT
|
Search
|
Login/Register
Home
»
Analog Playback
»
Why second tonearm/cartridge does not sound like first one? (3 posts, 1 page)
Print Thread
|
1st Post
|
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
Select Pages:
06-07-2011
Post does not mapped to
Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat
Boston, MA
Posts 10,184
Joined on 05-28-2004
Post #:
1
Post ID:
16418
Reply to:
16418
Why second tonearm/cartridge does not sound like first one?
fiogf49gjkf0d
The people who has more than one tonearm for stereo might understand me. I kind of pissed as my dally tonearm/cartridge does not sound as good as my reference tonearm/cartridge. What does it mean? It means that for dally records spinning sometimes I need to lift my ass up and switch for better sounding tonearm/cartridge if I would like to get better sound.
I do not like it. Particularly it is annoying as I know what the difference is between my second tonearm/cartridge and the first one and I know where the second tonearm/cartridge slip. I am not too anal about it as I basically use my second tonearm/cartridge like FM listening: I play records that I do not care to clean and I do not particularly care about sound. Still as I observe myself I less and less play records the I do not know and more friendly then I would like I play my records with second set tonearm/cartridge.
In this regards I see two conclusions. First conclusion - I need stop to be a fool and stop to save my references needle. I’m working of it but I can’t help myself – I am a Cancer and we all are a bit screwed up with over preservation and over-reserve. The second conclusion – make cheap needles that sounds like best expensive one. I do not see why it is not the case. Why people do not make cheap disposable $200-$300 cartridge that sound like those great reference cartridge? The cartridge of $200 and cartridge of $5000 are very identical and it is not that a better cartridge has more efforts, materials or time to make. So, why they do not make some kind of Liberation cartridge that would sound great and will be sold by pounds?
The caT
"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
06-07-2011
Post does not mapped to
Knowledge Tree
montepilot
Boston, MA.
Posts 42
Joined on 12-13-2007
Post #:
2
Post ID:
16419
Reply to:
16418
Very simple
fiogf49gjkf0d
MM cartridges with replaceable styli.
"It's like an act of murder; you play with the intent to commit something"--Duke Ellington
06-11-2011
Post does not mapped to
Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat
Boston, MA
Posts 10,184
Joined on 05-28-2004
Post #:
3
Post ID:
16448
Reply to:
16418
I kind of wonder why?
fiogf49gjkf0d
What really pisses me off is that my second arm/cartridge has a very strange effect that I did not see neither in this arm (Micro 282) not in this cartridge (Ortofon SPU Classic). I am taking about dynamic compression. In fact it is very seldom you can find compression in analog. My first arm/cartridge has huge dynamic advantage over my second arm/cartridge. I have no idea where it might come from… It feels like it loaded to impedance of 100 times less than it has to be but it is not. It loaded to 65R that is a bit low but very much within the acceptable realm… Still it has HUGE compression and I think it begin to have it last year. In my old room the same arm/cartridge did not have so much compression…
The Cat
"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
Select Pages:
Home Page
|
Last 24Hours
|
Search
|
SiteMap
|
Questions or Problems
|
Copyright Note
The content of all messages within the Forums Copyright © by authors of the posts