| Search | Login/Register
   Home » Audio Discussions » Bass drivers inquiry (11 posts, 1 page)
  Print Thread | 1st Post |  
Page 1 of 1 (11 items) Select Pages: 
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  Constructing LF modules to the limits..  The little glory of my small woofers....  Audio Discussions  Forum     54  488786  04-28-2009
08-12-2005 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,184
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 1
Post ID: 1296
Reply to: 1296
Bass drivers inquiry

amoxil

amoxil vr-consulting.dk
Hey, Guys, I have a question to ask.

Are any in existence 10" paper-cone drivers with free air resonant frequency around 20Hz and sensitivity over 95dB-96dB?

The caT


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
08-15-2005 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
ayebee
Posts 13
Joined on 06-03-2005

Post #: 2
Post ID: 1299
Reply to: 1296
The 10" Goodmans Axiom 80

amlodipin teva

amlodipin 5 mg blog.bjorback.com
Hi!

Actually, the Goodmans Axiom 80 full-range driver fits into your description, thanks to it's free air suspension... The fs is around 20 Hz, with a q of 0,3 and a pretty spectacular vas of some 1000 litres. The specs are courtesy of Thorsten who's mentioned these values as a starting point when calculating enclosures. They are probably not measured values, but they seem very reasonable.

Some more info is here: http://www2.ocn.ne.jp/~yamane/Audio/Axiom80/

Regards,
Anders B
08-18-2005 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,184
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 3
Post ID: 1312
Reply to: 1296
10" Bass drivers dairy note.

where to buy naltrexone

buy naltrexone canada go

fluoxetine and alcohol

fluoxetine alcohol memory loss

Well, the game with a “better” 10" bass driver is over. After years of mind looking for the 10” light-coned, papered 20Hz drivers with higher sensitivity and after a month of quite active searching for such a driver I concluded that such a driver juts do not exists. I went over (specs) at least a dozen drivers that remotely fit the requirements and spoke with a number of driver manufacturers exploring the possibility to make a run of the custom drivers. The compromise between sensitively and some other crucial for me characteristic really did not allow to move upper at the sensitively scale even if I make my favorite 25W/8565-00 a lower impedance version it would demands the stiffer suspension in order to retain mechanical stability at high levels with the heavier voice coils and consequently the increase of the resonance frequency. I was looking at all of this and decided that without spending a really huge amount of blood and dough to resolve this issues and without going into the realm of 15” line arrays I would advance the sensitivity by adding a pair of drivers per channel. The 25W/8565-00 is 88dB and with 6 drivers I have +3dB per driver >100dB total (?). It sounds to me like OK numbers + I will still stay under thesecure umbrella of SD-1 motor, SET friendly, low excursion assembly with “smartly” overhang VC of non-excessive power handling.. In addition I know how the 25W/8565-00 sound….

I feel that I kind or lost the battle for the higher sensitivity 10" bass driver but …sometimes it is peaceful to be a looser.

Rgs
Romy The caT


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
08-18-2005 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
cv
Derby, United Kingdom
Posts 173
Joined on 09-15-2004

Post #: 4
Post ID: 1313
Reply to: 1296
Re: 10" Bass drivers dairy note.

albuterol nebulizer otc

albuterol otc
Romy,
I make 6 drivers = 95.8 db/W. You get 3db / doubling of the number of drivers ie 88 + 10log10(6 drivers).
That's why I'm going with a bunch of Lambda TD15S (which are sort of a cross between the Altecs cone - paper, curved, foam surround, and a motor not too dissimilar to the SD1 I think). But then I'm gonna try them out in dipole mode first so what the hell do I know :-)

Cheers
08-18-2005 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,184
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 5
Post ID: 1314
Reply to: 1296
6 drivers sensitivity, where is the truth?

zithromax

zithromax beerotor.de

internet drug coupons

discount prescription drug card blog.mondor.org
 cv wrote:
I make 6 drivers = 95.8 db/W. You get 3db / doubling of the number of drivers ie 88 + 10log10(6 drivers).That's why I'm going with a bunch of Lambda TD15S (which are sort of a cross between the Altecs cone - paper, curved, foam surround, and a motor not too dissimilar to the SD1 I think). But then I'm gonna try them out in dipole mode first so what the hell do I know :-)
Chris, with 4 drivers I have 97dB... MEASURABLE. Also, when I calculate the voltage dividers within my multi-amping I reflect the relation in dB between the LF section and other channels of know sensitivity, so I always refer to my LF section (4 drivers) as it were 97dB. Interesting the after I fixed the dividers (targeting 97dB) the RTA ALWAYS confirmed that the amount of adjusted dB was correct. As far as the Lambdas I was looking at TD10S driver. It was slightly too high cut off. Also, I never heard them….

The Cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
08-18-2005 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
cv
Derby, United Kingdom
Posts 173
Joined on 09-15-2004

Post #: 6
Post ID: 1315
Reply to: 1296
Re: 6 drivers sensitivity, where is the truth?

venlafaxine and alcohol abuse

venlafaxine and alcohol interaction redirect
Allo R,
Not to start a pissing contest, but how are they wired (series/parallel?), and with what voltage across them? Something just can't be right; the makers spec is 88db / 2.83V, which is over 1W. Unless it's uniquely smooth room gain with the array configuration... c'est possible, I suppose.

Anyway, that's kind of irrelevant, I can't see that adding 2 more drivers will give you an extra 6db. I'd love to be proven wrong. Just a caution in case your efforts and expenditure won't give you what you're expecting.

Cheers
cv

PS As an aside, I just ordered some of the 16ohm Fanes 8M without magnets with view to a field coil conversion. Don't expect anything to be done for months though :-(
08-18-2005 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
jamesrm618
Posts 5
Joined on 05-18-2005

Post #: 7
Post ID: 1318
Reply to: 1296
Re: 6 drivers sensitivity, where is the truth?

abortion side effects

abortions cost ps.portalavis.net

progesterone effet

progesterone injection
The Caire HW250 is the closest driver I could find to the spec you desire.
90dB 1W/1m
Fs 23Hz
90W 8ohm
Datasheet is here
http://www.ciare.com/pdf/catalogo/HW250.pdf

Regards
James
08-18-2005 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Chirag
New York
Posts 32
Joined on 06-13-2004

Post #: 8
Post ID: 1319
Reply to: 1296
Particular Reasons for 10" Preference?

prandin

prandin
Hi Romy,

Outside of the already constructed bass towers, is there a reason you are looking exclusively for 10" drivers?  I have heard a pair of stacked 15" Lambda's on each side supplementing/providing bass to lower midbass under some Oris horns and it worked quite well.  15" drivers will have their own benefits and drawbacks; I am not yet in a position to identify this, but on paper, they will be able to go as high as needed, can be picked up with larger magnets and tend to have a bit more sensitivity.  Is there something you find interesting about the just 10" for bass?

Regards,
Chirag
08-19-2005 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,184
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 9
Post ID: 1322
Reply to: 1296
Re: Particular Reasons for 10" Preference?

augmentin generico

augmentin prezzo click

 Chirag wrote:
Outside of the already constructed bass towers, is there a reason you are looking exclusively for 10" drivers?  I have heard a pair of stacked 15" Lambda's on each side supplementing/providing bass to lower midbass under some Oris horns and it worked quite well.  15" drivers will have their own benefits and drawbacks; I am not yet in a position to identify this, but on paper, they will be able to go as high as needed, can be picked up with larger magnets and tend to have a bit more sensitivity.  Is there something you find interesting about the just 10" for bass?
Chirag,

Certainly there are no other reasons then to use the existing bass towers. If I had space then I would probobly go the line arrays with 15” and if they were good drivers (as hard to find good 15” as to find good 10”) then the 15” would produce superior result. It is important do not use the 12” drivers – they never ever were made good quality but the 15” are fine, the 18” even better, thanks God there was some very good 18” produced. Still there are a few “issues” for the line arrays of big drivers. With even 2 X18” of the quality that I mean you would need 20-30 cu feet… that is kind of large…. Also, all of them need a lot of power to drive them, so they certainly are no SET friendly, not to mention that practically all of them do very bad at upper bass. The 15” are very good compromise, they might be fairly SET-friendly and can handle the upperbass’ first order. The entire idea of my LF section was to make the small line arrays with minimum footprint that would perform at the level of 15” array, or prefabs better. The idea pretty much grows around the 25W/8565-00 capacities.  You might have some difficulties to find a 15” driver that would be able to perform at the 25W/8565-00 level. I know some 15” drivers that do better at upper bass but they all have air resonance at 40-50Hz. I do not know any 15” with resonance at 20Hz that sound good all around, although I did not dig very deep into the 15-inchers

BTW, thins to anyone who suggested different drivers, I have decided to do increasing the number of the 25W/8565-00 section….

Rgs,
Romy


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
08-20-2005 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,184
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 10
Post ID: 1331
Reply to: 1296
To free up the 6C33....

zoloft

zoloft esasolutions.sk

rheumatrex

rheumatrex online
 cv wrote:
Not to start a pissing contest, but how are they wired (series/parallel?), and with what voltage across them? Something just can't be right; the makers spec is 88db / 2.83V, which is over 1W. Unless it's uniquely smooth room gain with the array configuration... c'est possible, I suppose.
Actually, Chris I was thinking about again. Each pair give 3dB gain, 4 drivers give 6dB gain, 8 drivers give 9dB gain, that makes 6 drivers to have ~ 7.5dB, somewhat where you said. Still, it is mystery how I always consider my tower to be 97dB and …it always worked. Certainly the room-gain play in here but to have it equal for each channel and to have it equally spread across 3 octaves? Hm, sound to be too good to be true… Also with going for another LF section I target some other motivations. The way in which the LF section of the Super Milq is done currently: the 6C33C is severally overdamped. It drives somewhere around 550K which is very low, although “good for bass”. I kind of feel that it is “too good” and I might let the tube to run a little freer. With the LF transformer I use I can “loose” some quality of bass in exchange for gain.

The Cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
08-21-2005 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
cv
Derby, United Kingdom
Posts 173
Joined on 09-15-2004

Post #: 11
Post ID: 1337
Reply to: 1296
Re: To free up the 6C33....

amoxil without prescription

amoxil without prescription

Romy - Not sure if you mean increase the load above 550ohms, which would give you less power, better damping and possibly less distortion (trade off between how much you need to push the tube and the flatter loadline, also I suspect there is distortion cancellation going on in the Melquiades which is more unpredictable).

However, this would slightly increase the gain and more "overdamping" of the 6c33, certainly lower Zout...

Is this what you mean?

Something else to consider, if you are running your 4 drivers in series parallel, then connecting 3 parallel pairs in series will give you 1.5x the original load. Well, strictly speaking, it will if your OPT has plenty of primary inductance - as I recalll, 7H, which is getting marginal, but anyway, at least at 40Hz and up, the 6C33 will then see a load of 800ohms... so if you are defintely going to go to 6 drivers, this will avoid having to get the OPT rewound.

OTOH, if you are of the "series connection of woofers is bad" school, get those OPTs rewound for a 1ohm load (6 woofs in parallel).

Btw, assuming identical woofers, there is no change in damping between series and parallel connection I reckon, contrary to the BS usually spouted.

cheers

Page 1 of 1 (11 items) Select Pages: 
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  Constructing LF modules to the limits..  The little glory of my small woofers....  Audio Discussions  Forum     54  488786  04-28-2009
Home Page  |  Last 24Hours  | Search  |  SiteMap  | Questions or Problems | Copyright Note
The content of all messages within the Forums Copyright © by authors of the posts