|
Romy the Cat
Boston, MA
Posts 10,193
Joined on 05-28-2004
Post #:
|
52
|
Post ID:
|
25691
|
Reply to:
|
25689
|
|
|
There is nothing further then this.
|
|
|
|
Paul S wrote: | Now as ever in hi-fi there seems to be no economically viable model for developing, producing, marketing and servicing good sounding equipment. As ever, it remains for the end user to find and develop their own equipment from whatever happens to be available at the time. On the other hand, as ever there are still ways to do this, despite the demise of any given commercial product line. People in this forum seem to forget that horns don't sound better than other topologies but they are simply more efficient than other speakers, which opens the door to certain power options that are not honestly viable with other types of speakers. However, it's not about the topology, and it's not about the thickness of one's wallet, and it's not just about the ears but mainly what's between them. We can't just wait for "manufacturers" to do the job for us, and we certainly can't count on The Public to Support Good Sound. One of the most frustrating things for me has been that even at the level of drivers it seems to be almost entirely random in terms of real world result not just in terms of topology or even one line versus another but also driver to driver, down to individual units. Feh! |
|
Hmmmm, it is interesting subject(s)
but in my view your post mixed so many things into one pile. One subject that I
would like to address however. No one made a claim that horns sound better than
other topologies. In fact, if you look at the number of attempts by topologies
then probably horns will be not the winners. It just happened that by virtue me
embracing horn topology for my own playback the majority of context at this
site is about horns. There is nothing further then this.
"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
|
|
|