Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Audio Discussions
In the Thread: It’s mad, mad, mad... electricity.
Post Subject: The not sufficient definition of 'good for sound electricity'.Posted by Romy the Cat on: 2/20/2009
fiogf49gjkf0d

Floobydust,

I very much disagree with you on it, not because I have an alternative view but because I have practical evidences that what you say is not sufficient definition of “good for sound electricity”. The lower THD is not adequate representation and there are many examples of very low, fractions of present distortions and consequentially a perfect since, built not satisfactory sonic results. Reversely I have expense the good electricity days with about 5% distortions and sinusoid looking like a railway after nuclear blast.  I do have a large collection of varicose devises that I was employing to fight electricity over the years and I need to report that it is not as simple and predicable as you say. The PP2000 is certainly nothing new in nether concept not in implementation. However, among what I experienced PP2000 is very much new in results. If you can name me another available power devise or tested  and rendered implementation principle that might help to eliminating those subjective negative effects of bad electricity but do not affects the core sound of played material then I would be only grateful for learning about it and would gladly try it.  I am sure we understand that it is very much not about PP2000, I would gladly do not have it if I know HOW to deal with bad electricity myself. The problem is that I do not know. That, BTW, why I created the following thread:

http://www.romythecat.com/Forums/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=9623

Rgs, Romy the Cat

BTW: the waveform symmetry is the same as THD....

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site