Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site

I got the last revision of APS Purepower regenerator. This one has all newest Purepower updates and in addition it is more powerful -2000W regenerator. Whoever follow my saga with APS know that is the 7th  APS regenerator I tried. I have a lot of expectations from this devise despise the previous 5 busted in flame and one was not operating properly.

The 2000 Purepower shell be a more powerful version of 1050 unit but it is not. In contrary to what APS suggested the 2000 Purepower behaves differently, regenerates differently and sound differently. During the next few days/weeks I will be posting my observation about the Purepower 2000. I have already a lot of interesting information but I would like it to hatch a bit in my mind. What however is the good sign that it looks like the 2000 is much more reliable unit then the former 1050.  I run it in all possible configuration and applications over the last two days (the home confiding blizzard is certainly helps) and the regenerator operation from the perspective of blow-not-blow was flawless. I have to admit that there was quite a few times when I crossed my fingers and expected the room filed with the famous smell of burned electronics – it did not happen. There was a moment once want I drove one of my Milq from Purepower 2000 and with all perfect operation parameters on Milq and on Purepower the Milq’s transformer were hissing like crazy. I never seen anything like this and shot the amp and shot the amps. Later on I never was able to replicate it and the Purepower operated without problems.

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site