Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site
In the Forum: Audio Discussions
In the Thread: 'Fundamental rich' listening, or is RTA even close to accurate?
Post Subject: you're right paul!Posted by stuck.wilson on: 8/19/2007
no- there's no reason why it wouldn't make sense NOT to give 'er a crack-- at worst, i wouldn't like the results!
i guess the difficult part really is sorting out measurement vs. hearing- tricky at best! trying to assemble sense from possibly faulty measurements leads in alot of directions-- what needs to happen, i s'pose, is very careful calibration, which i don't have currently.. and that in itself would render all these questions moot, because i'd have a standard to measure by outside of my ear! my apologies to all for a half formed question out of process!
meanwhiles-- there IS output well over 2k for certain- that's the knee of where it begins to decrease by about 6db/octave. it's extrapolating whether it's a measurement error i'm dealing with or that the de facto standard isn't necessarily perfect that i'm getting at.
onwards!
d.Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site