Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Playback Listening
In the Thread: Audio critique – open your mind!
Post Subject: It's not a question that would make me to thinkPosted by Romy the Cat on: 8/2/2007

 guy sergeant wrote:
The other option is of course "Publish and be damned" the only downside being that people may be less reluctant to lend you things if they are concerned that they can't trust your confidentiality.

Romy! you're no better than the magazines you despise! What is the world coming to?
Guy, you are missing the whole point of this exercise. The point was: why we ever need secrecy, why we need “conditional confidentiality” and why an absolutely normal process of experience and evaluation of public products should be surrounded by stupid mental schemas and artificial conditions.

The subject of this thread was a call to open our minds, to come clean about our audio assessments, about our audio results and to let out ability to express what we feel to run free. I do not play games, I know those games, but I do not play them. And it is my wish.

BYW, I would like to accent that the Weiss DAC is publicly available unit and it should be no confidentiality of any kind regarding it. It is not an experimental project with unknown results. I was involved in number of experimental project, including with “big name’ companies and you never heard or will hear from me about them. Those projects ARE off the table for any public exposure. However, as a serials production, publicly available model … what is the problem there?

In the end Clark, said right about Truth. What we care more: about the health of César or about preservation of Roma? It is not a question that'll make me to think too long…

The caT

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site