Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Horn-Loaded Speakers
In the Thread: How to USE “Resonating Oops” in loudspeakers
Post Subject: Injection Channel response vs. Main Speaker...Posted by Romy the Cat on: 5/12/2007
 Paul S wrote:
You have mentioned that you want a much larger enclosure for your oops unitSleep.  I was then wondering if you aim to merely broaden and/or lower resonant response or if you planned to in some way tailor resonance as it relates to Fs.  Then I thought about the "nearly sealed" enclosure that can be tuned by stuffing or otherwise variably blocking its +/- port, which is what Tommy Horning does with his $$$$$$ units.  Because you have described the injection as "toxic", like that little dash of arsenic that keeps one sharp,  perhaps a vari-port is an option in this unusual and isolated "toxic" case?
Hm, I do not know yet but I would like to explore this opportunity. The Reds 10” have resonance somewhere around 27Hz and my drivers can handle slightly more power then the regular Reds. So, I am planning to put them in 6-7 cub feet box. The will not be too much unsuspended because I drive them very softly, so, it will be almost an infinite baffle solution. I do not know if I will be using that bass - I always will be able to kill it if I do not need it… BTW, below are  (1) the Macondo's response with the Injection Channel and (2) the response of my current “Injection Channel” itself.


Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site