Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Playback Listening
In the Thread: 2+3 surround sound??
Post Subject: I do need to make a video about it.Posted by Romy the Cat on: 4/19/2025
 N-set wrote:
Thank you! I’ve located anp paid for DSP3000. The RI speakers: what are your experiences/thoughts?I obviously miss bass energy with Dannoys. Logically, I should then look for bass capable satelites or this logic doesnt work?
DSP 3000 what's the best standalone pre only unit they did. To have the same in terms of the option with a receiver you would need to go for model 3080 and up. I do not know if the larger receivers have the same exact schematic as 3000. The problems that I have seen with 3000s was that they are frequently disregulated. I had four of them and three of them were not properly calibrated. Like one channel can be slightly off from another channel. I did not try to fix them but it would be pain in as. In terms of speakers and amplifications for reverberation channels by Yamaha topology it is kind of tricky. As you would be listening quote Yamaha field injection channels output you will see it is not a normal signal and you will find that good acoustic system not necessary need to be there. However if you go with Auro, that basically do the same benefits but very different means , then you would need better amplifier and better acoustic system for reverberation channels, particulary Auro bass channels. This is why I thought to record video because the subtleties that you can implement this dedicated Aura base channel offer very very interesting and completely not explored opportunity.  In your specific case, with Dannoy's bass it will be even more complex. I think it would be too complex to deal in your case with Aura and Yamaha-style injection with big delay would be easy to integrate. You are about to discover a lot of very interesting experiences and I sincerely believe service proper reverberation injection you would not be looking for an options to extend the bottom knee of your Dannoy. With Aura you would be able to mitigate how much base you have in real time and how much you have it delayd output it is not just delayed bass. If you read carefully what I stated in my thread about ampX then you recognize the time made some comments which suggest that a proper bass during sound reproduction should not be the same signal as a driven that mid frequency channels. I know that old people pretty much bypasses is comment as meaningless but it is not, and people do not understand what I meant. What I meant however is very crucial. The distribution of harmonic context across amplitude for meat frequency and base supposed to be different and you would need a very very very very very very very smart amplifier which would not be working linear in terms of harmonics but to have on brain how to bias it in actave-dependent fashion. AmpX doesn it natively, for most of us are amplifiers you would need a harmonics equalizer, which is very hard to implement properly. Hypothetically, you might have educated bass amplifier which act at combination of direct, delayed, and harmonically reformed signal but to the best of my knowledge there is no amps who does it. So, when you see super good Bass driver in any enclosure driven by a super good amplifier.... then it is just a bad design from the people who are completely blind to the fact that a linear signal should not be driven base channels.

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site