Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site

Poul, lamm ml2, the original not the division. It was from my point of view the best amplifier out there for a low frequency. When you have enough sensitivity in low frequency and you're able to idle ml2 output stage you was able to get base which is absolutely unknown for majority of audio people. Trust me, in that time I pretty much know all amplification available. The problem with ml2 is that it is 18 what only and if you need to suck out of it a little bit more that it instantaneously clip by voltage or by carrent, depends how you load output stage. ML3 is completely different concept. Is that output stage of that amplifier is specifically designed enter A2 mode and if you even drive it harder it's enters very very gentle soft clipping. the ML2 this indirectly heated trion purely topologically cannot work in a2 mode. 

No, the most interesting question is to learn if ml2 in its own best operation parameters deeply in A1 mode produces better or worse bass then ml3 in class A1 or A2. To answer this question you need to have a way back installation with no compromise low frequency section and so far I did not only personally experience it but I also looking in the vote other ml3 owners do, I did not feel that is there low frequency sections able to make Justice for either ML2 or Ml2. This is why I publicly stated that if somebody kills the day to be able to stress ML3 against truly serious low frequencies section then please invite me and I would like to hear it

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site