Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site
In the Forum: Playback Listening
In the Thread: 2+3 surround sound??
Post Subject: Not sure what you are trying to say...Posted by Romy the Cat on: 7/27/2021
Paul, I think you are taken
it in a wrong direction in my view. It is absolutely relevant what your main speakers
do, play mono, or stereo, how and why it was mixed. It is what it is, and we do
not interact with main sound in any way or form. It feels to me that we do not
use the Village Gate or any other short reverberation time programs as it has
two short delays and the sound of reverberation channels become to “talk” with
sound of main channels. You want the sound from main and reverberation channels
to be completely separated entities that has nothing in common in terms of “primary
sound”. You should “hear” your reverberation channels only when you abruptly stop
music. The objective of reverberation channels is not change primary sound but
to trick your mind and put your perception in the condition what you perceive the
primary sound differently. I am not
expert with the subject, and I juts begin to experiment with it but that is
what I feel so far.
I am not sure what you
wanted to say by comparing reverberation channels with PP3000. Whoever was
lucky to get properly working PP3000 know what this machine can do. Again, I am
not trying to convince neither you or anybody else and what you do in terms of
your own experiments, or you own believes is only your business. From what I
hear now is that you are repeat the patters that you had with PP300: express a lot of skepticism without trying the
PP3000. I understand that in case of PP3000 it was a high entrance fee lottery
with very low chance to win but in case of reverberation channels there is practically
no entrance fee. All that you need is $50
worth old receiver with psychoacoustic futures, most of them from end 80s and 90s.
I think your skepticism would be much more valuable if you try it and then
express your judgement.Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site