Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site
In the Forum: Horn-Loaded Speakers
In the Thread: New superlative horn build - ESD acoustic
Post Subject: I do not know about that.Posted by Romy the Cat on: 4/4/2019
rowuk wrote: |
What can we expect from a 6 figures system? |
|
Rowuk,
this is very interesting question and much more complex than you might think.
The presumption is that if we look at 1/4 million dollars playback system then
we should have out of box reputable sound. I very much challenge that
presumption. A reputable Sound of a property of a listener’s own
self-development and no external investment or presuemed playback quality can
furnish it to a person. A guy from Germany in my listening room a few months
ago did experience Sound that might be considered reputable and his reaction
was a good illustration of what I say: he was exposed to a result to wish he
was not ready yet. If so, then what we expect from a super expensive playback
system or in this case: an expensive acoustic system.
Here
is what I feel: a 6 figures system should take care about something that 5
figures system could not. It is as simple as it but it is very complex at the
same time. The people who design 6 figures systems should (in theory) recognize
the complexity of problems and divert expense to address the complexity. Not to
build up expense to address some kind of imaginary objectives or to patronize
some kind marketing BS but demonstrate advance understanding of the problems
and provide the objectively “expensive”
solutions to delivery user satisfaction regarding the complex problems. I do feel that if a company does it then they
can claim exclusive pricing.
The
case to point: Wilson Audio. Discard the smaller Wilsons, then are not good but
if you look at the largest Wilson then you will see that somehow they solved a
few typical problem of most of box loudspeakers (compression for instance). In
my view they can charge 6 figures as they recognize the problem and did spent
very tangible efforts to address the problem.
Another care to point: The current company of the thread ESD
acoustic. I do not feel that what they do is 6 figures system even if they show
to you that all of this is very expensive to make. The Jacky presentation at the last page is
very nice, not that I agree with everything but it is a good buttering up of yourself
and perspective customers why the ESD should be good and why it should be expensive.
What is missing from Jacky presentation is the user benefits and statement that
they went into complexity to care about user benefits. What ESD did was
investment into manufacturing that they took as is with no nurturing and care
about users. In my view the care about end users is the ONLY thing worth to pay
more or whatever is asked to be paid.
When Avantgarde introduced their first horn in 1999 they set
their most expensive Trio system to be I believe $35K, which skimming the BS mark
ups was under 20K retail. That was pretty much how it should cost then because horns
is very contrary to popular believe are not expensive acoustic system to make. Avantgarde
invested very little into user benefit and they do not be paid more then what
it was. ESD did so far kind of the same. They invented a myth of expense and quality
but they did not go to complexity of user benefit and I do not need to hear the
ESD installation to recognize it.
I do think that ESD MF driver is might be very interesting product.
I have no idea if they market it separate and what the price might be. Still,
should a system to be 6 figures of it has a potentially interesting MF
drivers?
Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site