Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Audio For Dummies ™
In the Thread: A DSET is better then an expensive SET
Post Subject: About playback waterfall sequence.Posted by Romy the Cat on: 6/2/2014
fiogf49gjkf0d
 decoud wrote:
I know you do not want to do it, but it is a shame not to do it: actually manufacture a version of the Macondo with an integrated dset, cut down enough (say three channels) to make it feasible while still demonstrating the advantages of the dset idea. Indeed, was not Jessie thinking of spinning something commercial out of his elegant plaster horns? The point of making it commercial is only to make the dissemination of the idea tangible, not just talk.
 
Decoud,

fist off all I have no interest to become audio industry professional and to call an army idiots out there as my colleges.

Second, I am not sure that the idea of Generic DSET is a viable idea. You see, if you read the debate at the Brit site above then you will see that there was a gentleman in there who build amplification and then match his acoustic system to his amps. I very much disagree to his approach and in fact it serve great deserves to the whole DSET notion. The whole idea of DSET is that an amp address need of the given speaker canal  not only serve a given frequency range. The inversion that this Brit buy suggest is very faulty. I think the right playback design sequence is following
1) Appraisal of listening space and choosing the an acoustic system topology that would be suitable for the given listening space.

2) Proposing and real-estate testing the acoustic system details
3) Implementing the acoustic system with full-range amplification
4) Proposing DSET configuration and altering the acoustic system details with regard of DSET capacity.
5) Implementation of DSET and fine-tuning the acoustic system and DSET details.

I do think that thinking about amplification and a beginning of everything in playback is kind of "wrong", to say the least.
Rgs, Romy
 

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site