Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Audio Discussions
In the Thread: A quest for a better monitor.
Post Subject: Monitors againPosted by unicon on: 11/10/2009
fiogf49gjkf0d
 Romy the Cat wrote:
 Romy the Cat wrote:
...To substitute SL600 original tweeter with anything else, would it be Revelators, Diamond or made from Faberge Eggs is like to make a movie with Humphrey Bogart and ask busboy form a nearby Chinese restaurant to re-record the Bogart’s dialogs. The SL600 tweeter with pure copper dome and phenolic suspension was probably the most perfect tweeter even was made (sonically), with only disadvantage in sensitively department.
romyio.
most monitors serve dry decay. and they cant do anything right below 100hz they blow it they just cut it .
u may like it short time. but im worried if your ears can enjoy them.

im little late but i suggest you hearing a pair of wharfedale diamond 8.3 (its 2 way floorstanding and ported)
ok when u finish laughting, give it a try ... . i tested the pair(fq response, room response, decay, waterfall).  it sounds great and not exhibiting alot with room character.
u can count on them . label 1 as monitor and use it .
just wanted to be help.

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site