Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Audio Discussions
In the Thread: It’s mad, mad, mad... electricity.
Post Subject: The different debugging philosophyPosted by Romy the Cat on: 7/16/2009
fiogf49gjkf0d

Lucian,

If your system draws a steady 500W, do not use LC filtration and if you would like to buy 700 model then you might reconsider it and look at 1050 mode or 2000 model. The more load you have on this thing is the better result is, I personally would like to load the APS with 25%. That is why I lobby them to conceder 3kW or even 4kW units as then I will be able to run my .8kW-1kW with better result.

I do not think that “money lost on a bad purchase” is a factor as APS has 30 day trail pres during wish you can make your mind. With all my bitching about many aspect of APS confusion I need to point out that since the last December my PP2000 works flawlessly and sound wonderfully.  The ASP even promised in a couple weeks to send some kind of fix for the “fussiness problem” that I described before. Well, they promised “in couple weeks” six months ago but it is how it goes with them. My own positive experience with positive results I got from PP2000 might not be demonstrable to you, as you might recognize from the comments of others.

However, the main purpose of this there is not product evaluation but finding a solution. I think that is the ASP devises are done properly then they might be a very god tool to fight bad electricity. How to make the ASP to make their regenerators with fewer bags… I do not know. They do get better, in my view not at the level what they shall be. In a normal engendering world they shell compile the list of all know problems, heir an experience consultant to review the whole design, fix up the flows that it had and released the next bugs-free version. Employing the design with service packs is a legitimate way to do business as well but personally would not chose to do it in case of hardware.

The Cat

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site