| Search | Login/Register
   Home » Horn-Loaded Speakers» Tweeter for Vitavox S2. High-sensitively ribbons? (65 posts, 4 pages)
  Print Thread | 1st Post |  
Page 3 of 3 (65 items) Select Pages:  « 1 2 3
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  Electro-Voice T350, T35, + Fostex tweeters...  TAD ET-703...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     34  383597  04-28-2005
  »  New  Macondo Horns: biography...  Macondo with Pussy Eyes....  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     2  45751  05-18-2005
  »  New  Null-set dipole butterfly tweeters...  Null-set dipole butterfly tweeters...  Audio Discussions  Forum     1  21226  10-16-2006
  »  New  Lowther Driver..  Schadenfreude II...  Audio Discussions  Forum     61  409086  11-15-2006
  »  New  The most promising “best” commercial speaker..  Viva Audio...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     190  1268813  12-06-2006
  »  New  RAAL “Water Drop” tweeter for Macondo...  Your comment takes me by surprise...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     77  668204  02-16-2007
  »  New  EnABL: Just a note to awaken all of you peaceful sleepe..  I think "the Russian" is simply trying to con...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     14  77740  04-14-2007
  »  New  Simpson Microphones thread...  A whole another subject....  Audio Discussions  Forum     45  221071  10-21-2007
  »  New  Metal domes..  Try the one Lansche is using...  Audio Discussions  Forum     6  53021  11-08-2007
  »  New  The Active High Frequency Solution - AHFS..  Small problems with the camera lens can be mistaken for...  Playback Listening  Forum     5  39665  02-06-2008
  »  New  Horn loaded ribbons and other Vasyachkin’s tangents......  Applied / evolved audio...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     33  146743  11-02-2008
  »  New  Living Voice Loudspeaker..  A Polish Infomercial from Kevin Scott....  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     80  434369  08-09-2009
  »  New  About HF Binaurallism..  What is going on now....  Playback Listening  Forum     1  15487  11-27-2010
11-06-2006 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 9,540
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 51
Post ID: 3089
Reply to: 3087
The SA8535 tweeter: even more

Well, it looks like my lack of familiarity with ribbons/planar/isodynamic tweeters made an evil joke with me as the more SA8535 tweeter getting broken in the better it sounds. As now, after near 80 hours it practically free from any negative things that I commented a couple posts above. In fact the SA8535 is surprisingly nicely performing tweeter and it literally getting better hourly. The Vitavox S2 is slightly more “faster” and has incontestably more “color bas relief” then SA8535 but they still can live together very nicely without compromising the S2. In the end I feel that SA8535 would be a very good  fall back, safety choose if my “ultimate tweeter project” would not sound properly.

It looks as my luck with tweeters is turning back. Defiantly the HF ribbons were a perspective direction to go…

Rgs.
Romy the Cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
11-06-2006 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
cv
Derby, United Kingdom
Posts 173
Joined on 09-15-2004

Post #: 52
Post ID: 3091
Reply to: 3089
Re: The SA8535 tweeter:crossover?

R,
How are you crossing over the SA tweeter?

Cheers
cv

11-06-2006 Post mapped to one branch of Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 9,540
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 53
Post ID: 3092
Reply to: 3089
A wonderful write up about ribbons.

Continuing to harass the readers of my site and myself with the good news about the performance of my SA8535 driver I would like to post a very educational article about the subject. As I told before, being familiar with sound of ribbons then never ignited my interest because the dead sensitivity and foolish use of ribbons in upper midrange region – the region where they do not do well sonically form my point of view (low contrast). However, being use AFTER a good MF driver and with a sufficient sensitivity they looks like are work out well. I do not wont to sound as I pump myself up after I liked what SA8535 did but the success of this driver actually made me to be interested of learning a little about the ribbon family.
Here is a very useful article that was publish in “Audio and Video Contractors Magazine” in March 2004. I find it is very informative and useful. Before posting the articles I would like to pass a few “Classic Romy” (the quote by Srajan Ebaen) words.

After I read the articles I asked myself: “Why out audio writing Morons do not write anything as useful as Mike Klasco did?” When the Hi-Fi audio writers write their stupid “generic purls” then it always has agenda, sponsor and very fealty smell. The British Hi-Fi+ published last month an “observation” about so-called “full range speakers”. I will not go here into explanation why it was very inaccurate examination of the subject but it was…. ironic to see that they pushed the full range concept juts because a full range manufacturing company would like to see the falty concept of their product… “pushed”. Surprise, surprise in a few pagers after expanding to the reader that the so-called “full range speakers” are very good… a big positive review of the company… accidentally was published. Anyhow, let them to go to die with thier reviewing little secret in peace. I am sure that Mike Klasco who wrote the article below did not have a full home of “sponsored” audio components in his home and was not under obligation to provide 6 glorious reviews per week.

TURNING PRO
By Mike Klasco, president of Menlo Scientific

Ribbon transducer manufacturing has traditionally been a specialized craft, even when part of a larger speaker manufacturing operation. The wisdom and perception for permanent installations was that the expense and temperamental aspects of ribbon diaphragm assemblies, their limited dynamic range, and the larger surface radiating area required for adequate low-end response limited their market acceptance. The smooth, transparent, and crisp sound quality and very low distortion has made the development of wider dynamic range ribbons a seductive goal.

In the 1990s, several firms carried the torch for ribbon speakers as they strove to achieve the elusive targets of wide dynamic range, high power handling, extended frequency response, and compact size. Now there are ribbons that have finally achieved their performance goals and are being installed successfully in more and more venues. Multiple ribbon elements may be arrayed for additional output and control over directivity, and the technique of line arrays is now in fashion because their excellent pattern control is a great asset in many difficult installations.

The general concept of using an array of transducers goes back to the column speakers of the 1950s and 1960s, when columns from Electro-Voice, JBL, and Bozak in the United States and Philips in Europe were commonly used. The approach is making a comeback in the guise of line arrays, and ribbons represent the closest approach to the ideal.

The planar ribbon speaker is, like the typical cone speaker, an electrodynamic driver. While there has been no shortage of product announcements and mock-ups of planar transducers at trade shows, actual market share of flat-panel speaker technologies (such as NXT) have not yet measured up to the hype of their proponents. On the other hand, the number of leading brands that have licensed the various flat-panel speaker technologies is impressive. The appeal for less intrusive speakers that will complement flat-screen video displays as well as offer a shallow profile for all the speakers needed for intelligent signage in commercial applications, such as at airports, is compelling. With all the raunchy-sounding flat speakers making the news, it is easy to forget that the finest audiophile speakers have been and remain ribbons and electrostatics, both charter members of the planar clan.

To start at the beginning, flat-panel speakers are not new. Quad, the brand name of the United Kingdom's Acoustical Manufacturing Company, demonstrated its full-range electrostatic planar speaker back in 1954. There have been dozens of (at least sonically) successful electrostatic products over the years, including the legendary KLH 9 and offerings from Acoustech 10, Janzen, Dayton Wright, and the Pickering models of the 1960s, followed by a rash of offerings in the 1970s from ESS (best known for its Heil Air-motion designs, a variant of the ribbon family), Infinity, SAE, Crown, and Soundcraftsman.

Most of this batch used the RTR mid/high-frequency electrostatic panels and a conventional woofer. Several high-end audiophile speakers that are essentially handmade have continued to appear during the past two decades. Although many concede that ribbons and electrostatic speakers frequently sound better than their more conventional competition, they do not account for significant business, nor do most have the dynamic range or the high output needed for public spaces. Yet the typical large vertical size of planars fits into the line array frenzy that has gripped the pro-audio industry and has brought planars into the limelight.

Ribbon magnetic structures are mechanically close to conventional cone speakers. They both share magnetic structures and voice coils. The original scheme for a ribbon transducer was a corrugated aluminum foil diaphragm/conductor. This approach tended to have very low resistance and required a transformer to bring the ribbon diaphragm's load impedance up so that the amplifier could drive it. To keep the mass low, thin aluminum foil was used and functioned as both the diaphragm and voice coil, but this resulted in a fragile driver. Today the most common ribbon arrangement is for a nonelectrically conductive film substrate to which an aluminum or copper conductor pattern is laminated. Traditionally, Mylar was used, and recently, Kapton and Kaladex (renamed Teonex by its manufacturer, DuPont). The polymer/conductor composite diaphragm is the same construction as a flexible circuit board commonly used in laptops, cell phones, and PDAs. The impedance of this diaphragm can be readily designed to be in a range that the amplifier can happily drive; not just a reasonable impedance, but also essentially a resistive load.

MADE FOR LINE ARRAYS

When the audio signal is run through the conductors, which are immersed in the magnetic field, the diaphragm will move in a mechanical analogy to the electrical signal, more or less like any cone speaker, but with a significant subtle differentiation that makes ribbons superior for line array configurations. The ribbon has the advantage that the diaphragm is directly driven uniformly by the conductors, which are in intimate contact with the film diaphragm. Ribbons have been called regular phase (by Foster) or isoplanar because the entire diaphragm is being driven, and the radiating surface is moving as one. With cone speakers, the vibrational energy from the voice coil has to pass by transconductance up through the voice coil bobbin and into the cone apex, where the sound will then move from the center of the cone outward and radiate into the air. The effective radiating area versus frequency is never uniform on a cone speaker, and the phase and group delay is not consistent over the operating frequency range. But with ribbons, the entire diaphragm moves simultaneously at all frequencies. Incidentally, this is antithesis of the concept of distributed mode transducers such as NXT, and the cone speaker falls somewhere in between. But for line arrays, ribbons are ideal.

Ribbon microphones have been around for about 70 years, and ribbon speakers first appeared later in the form of tweeters, such as the British Kelly Ribbon. The first ribbon tweeters used a corrugated diaphragm rather than a stretched tensioned film, but both are still commonly used. Corrugated ribbon tweeters are still used for studio monitors and audiophile tweeters but tend to be less Panasonic introduced the first film ribbon, which it named the Leaf Tweeter, essentially using a flex circuit board tensioned diaphragm. This is the construction used today for high-power ribbons. Panasonic affiliate JVC and also Foster (Japan) supplied ribbon leaf tweeters and midranges on an OEM basis for many years. Magnaplanar introduced full-range speaker units in the 1970s using the conductor on substrate approach for the lows and mids and the corrugated diaphragm for the tweeter. Infinity has featured its EMIT (tweeter) and EMIM (midrange) ribbons since the 1970s.

There have been several popular ribbon tweeters used in many speaker systems, but full-range ribbon speaker systems have previously been limited to small-batch high-end audiophile production. A few years ago, Sonigistix of Canada introduced its Monsoon ribbon multimedia system. Eastech now makes these ribbons in Malaysia. Using ribbon satellites and a conventional cone subwoofer, the Sonigistix Monsoon MM-700 was the first multimedia mainstream ribbon product that has achieved mass-market success.
So what about professional application for ribbons? Aside from studio monitor tweeters used in Genelec and others, the first really ambitious high-output ribbon was from Stage Accompany in the late 1980s and was based on a scale of a Philips home speaker design. Stage Accompany pursued touring sound applications and used the ribbon in place of a compression driver.

One of the first to match the form factor of a ribbon to a theoretically ideal line source line array was the Radia Pro Speakers group at Bohlender-Graebener. Aside from large vertical ribbons, it offers the Radia Series of ceiling and in-wall speakers using ribbon tweeters. In addition, the firm is an OEM supplier to Genesis, Eclipse, SLS, Martin Logan, and others.

SLS Loudspeakers took high power/high sound pressure level (SPL) ribbon driver technology further in terms of power handling and developed its own range of high-performance ribbon drivers based on high-energy neodymium magnets and Kapton/aluminum diaphragms. These drivers are incorporated in several of its line array systems for various professional and commercial applications.

A BETTER APPROACH TO PLANARS

Electrostatics and planar magnetics (ribbons) are driven uniformly over their entire diaphragms. This is the exact opposite to the distributed mode ideal of flat NXT panels, which operate in random phase across their surface. Cones, on the other hand, are uniform (pistonlike) up to the midrange. It is generally conceded that ribbons and electrostatic panels tend to sound better than cones, while the distributed mode panels sound worse. However, in certain pro applications in which a uniform phase line array's excellent pattern control is not needed, the nature of NXT panel radiation (the “antiribbon”) is an advantage. The wide coverage and random phase of a well-executed NXT design, such as the Armstrong i-Ceilings panel, is an advantage in the struggle to achieve wide uniform coverage with low ceilings as well as high acoustic levels before feedback. The random phase nature of the panel helps prevent feedback, effectively randomizing the phase of the signal. The Armstrong panels actually sound quite decent, to boot.

In the past, ribbons came up short on power handling, sensitivity, and low-end response. These limitations were due to the low energy of the ferrite magnets and the low temperature tolerance of the Mylar film diaphragms. With the falling price of neodymium magnets, along with their higher magnetic energy density, the sensitivity issues and limitations on magnetic gap width were lessened. Kaladex/Teonex and similar superior mechanical and thermal films allowed for higher temperature operation and further increased sensitivity owing to the possibility of thinner diaphragms.

Designers of ribbons using ferrite magnets have always been confronted with response anomalies. That is in part because the sound radiation coming from the diaphragm must pass between the bar magnets, and the depth required for the ferrite magnets results in resonant cavities with tuned peaks, typically between 5 and 10 kHz. Neodymium has high magnetic density, so the magnets are not as thick and the air column in front of the diaphragm is shallower, and any resonance is minimized and is typically above the audio band.

Assuming a generous gap, Neo structures yield 0.6 to 0.8 tesla (6,000 to 8,000 gauss), whereas a ferrite magnet would have provided less than half of that. The higher electrical damping that results eliminates the usual “camel hump” response of an underdamped speaker. Neodymium's higher energy enables wider gaps without the flux dropping below useable intensities, so higher diaphragm excursions are possible without hitting the magnets. As the excursion is increased, the diaphragm surface area can be reduced to a more reasonable size, which also improves dispersion.

DuPont Mylar has traditionally been used for both ribbons and electrostatic planar diaphragms. A single-sided conductor layer is usually laminated to the film, but some applications use conductive layers on both sides of the film. The conductor side is then silk-screened using a chemical resist coating that prints the pattern, with the uncoated paths of the surface being the conductor paths that will be etched away. This roll or sheets of silk-screened laminate is then chemically etched and die-cut into individual diaphragms. The lead-out wire is attached to the completed diaphragm, and the diaphragm is then assembled and tensioned into the magnetic structure frame. All that is far easier said than done!

Mylar yields good sound quality but cannot tolerate conductor over 80 to 90 degrees Celsius because that is Mylar's glass transition point, and at that temperature, it becomes soft. Because most ribbon diaphragms are tensioned, under high-power input the conductive voice coil heats up the substrate, the diaphragm tension drops because of the softening of the Mylar, and the film becomes rippled, leading to distortion or buzzing.

What about operating temperature that drivers function in and power compression effects? Compression drivers and woofers have the voice coil enclosed in a tight magnetic structure. Even with vented magnetic structures and ferrofluid to transfer the heat, operating temperatures can reach 400 degrees Fahrenheit. As the voice coil temperature rises, so does the impedance. The speaker draws less power, and the output creeps downward. This is known as power compression.

Compared with cone and compression drivers, the structure is open on a ribbon diaphragm, and though air is not a good conductor of heat, the surface area of the conductors lets good heat transfer off the diaphragm so operating temperatures tend to be lower for a given sound level. Temperature tolerance is another story and is dependent on the materials and fabrication of the diaphragm. Older hi-fi ribbon designs used Mylar polyester that was typically laminated with an adhesive layer to an aluminum foil. Especially for smaller drivers, Mylar ribbons have limited power handling and get soft above 150 degrees Fahrenheit. DuPont's Kaladex and Teonex high-performance polyesters are now commonly used in ribbons and can handle almost double that temperature before softening.

For the highest power handling, DuPont's Kapton, a polyimide is the ultimate solution. Kapton can tolerate temperature excursions to 800 degrees Fahrenheit, but it is likely that the adhesives layer will handle only half of that. Some of the more advanced ribbons use a cast polyimide over the aluminum conductor, avoiding the failure of the adhesives layer. Noted ribbon designer Igor Levitsky pointed out that even with adhesivesless polyimide diaphragms, at elevated power levels, the aluminum work hardens and can crack.
How are ribbon speakers increasing power handling? Stage Accompany has offered forced-air cooling as an option on its high-power ribbons, SLS has integrated a heat sink to pull heat off the aluminum conductors on the diaphragm, and DuPont has introduced thermally conductive black heat emissive Kapton to improve the ability of the film substrate to dump the heat.

Bohlender-Graebener is one of the first ribbon manufacturers to offer Kaladex/Teonex film diaphragms. The temperature capacity is 130 degrees Celsius before softening, and considering the open structure of ribbon speakers, this temperature limit appears to be satisfactory for most applications. The higher tensile strength (which increases the tension you can use) and higher Young's modulus (correlates to the speed of sound in the material) of Teonex is better than in Mylar, yet the specific gravity is lower than Mylar. The cost is just above that of Mylar. Sound quality is excellent, as reflected in both frequency response extension, as well as lower linear and nonlinear distortion.

UNIFORMITY

A ribbon's surface is immersed in a uniform magnetic field and moves in a uniform manner across its surface in response to electrical input. So by their very nature, properly designed ribbons are able to maintain uniform phase response across their surface, unlike traditional transducers. This results in a more uniform cylindrical wave regardless of frequency, while an array of point source radiators will produce an interference pattern with extreme comb filtering. The radiation pattern of any transducer is heavily influenced by the relationship between the wavelengths of the sound produced in relationship to the size of the active portion of the transducer.

Conventional, nonarrayed or nonline source speakers approximate a point source. A point source generates a spherical sound field in which sound pressure drops by 6 dB as a listener's distance from the source doubles. However, a line source, such as an array of long ribbon drivers, generates a cylindrical wave in its near field. This near field can extend large distances, depending on frequency and line source length, to hundreds of feet. A distinct characteristic of this near field used in line array applications is that its sound pressure drops only by 3 dB as a listener's distance from the source doubles. Although an in-depth discussion of point source versus the planar line source radiation pattern is beyond the scope of this article, suffice it to say that the ribbon works more like a line source than of the cruder approximation resulting from cone speakers mounted in a row.

The additional control over directivity is quite useful, both for where the sound does go (to the audience) and where it does not go (for example, a room's acoustically reflective floor and ceiling). That allows for much smoother and more consistent coverage and a superior ability to deliver direct sound to the audience even in reverberant environments. One of the many advantages of the control offered by a cylindrical wavefront is that patrons near the speakers do not have to suffer such high SPLs in order to ensure that audience members further back perceive adequate SPLs. Thus a line source system is a superior tool where intelligibility is important or the venue is acoustically difficult (for example, where there are glass surfaces everywhere, a longer throw is required, there are reflective or domed ceilings, or in corridor applications such as in museums).

Ribbons will continue their advance into mainstream commercial and pro-sound applications as their clean sound quality, ideal radiation characteristics for columns and line arrays, low weight, and increasing robustness, sensitivity, and acoustic output capacity attract more sound system designers and spec writers.




"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
11-06-2006 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 9,540
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 54
Post ID: 3093
Reply to: 3091
The tranning of SA8535….

 cv wrote:

How are you crossing over the SA tweeter?

Currently I cross them with second order at 12K, near Bessel Q, but not exactly. I did not play with crossover trying to tube it more precisely. It turn out the my driver was too “fresh” and it need some time to settle down it it’s default operation mode. I might consider to drive the driver slightly harder and to cross it with third order and I getting too soft. Interesting that it has completely different softness then T350. The T350 has tonal softness but the SA8535 has dynamic softness. I might need to try to drive the SA8535 with more power perhaps…

Anyhow, I do not looking at this point to finalize my view on the SA8535. It would be interesting to try the Arum Cantus G1 driver, wish it presumably a “real ribbon” and should have zillion times lighter transuding mass). After I pick “the semifinal winner” it will be a good contestant to the driver that Alexander will come up with…. So I’m holding now will try to play for a next moth getting the SA8535 and perhaps G1 (if I get one) to “behave”… It is very possible that it will be not “juts” a second order at 12K.

The cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
11-06-2006 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Paul S
San Diego, California, USA
Posts 2,148
Joined on 10-12-2006

Post #: 55
Post ID: 3094
Reply to: 3093
You might want give the G3 a look as well

Likely, the wider ribbons are less good for HF-only than a long, narrow ribbon, like the G3 and G3Si use.  Across the board, the larger the ribbon gets (and the lower the ribbon is made to go), the worse the dynamics at a higher frequency.  This gets confusing when the bigger ribbons are more efficient, but I think it is true at given SPL at HF.  Although I have never heard a ribbon that did not lack the last word in dynamics, the smallest and lightest I have tried, up high, have better dynamic sound than the larger "damped" ribbons, etc.  There is no doubt that the damped (coated and/or backed/and/or faced) "ribbons" are the worst of the ribbons in terms of the dynamic softness you note (at least, as I understand it).  They seem to excell at making nasty highs more tolerable.

You mention trying a 3rd order x-over, and my first thought of why you might do this would be to keep the ribbon from messing up what the S2 does better.  Still, I will be surprised if the "best" ribbon you find doesn't work best with a more gradual x-over. 

If you haven't done it yet, try moving your head around through the output axes of your S2 and the ribbon-du-jour.  *Perhaps* phasing is less important if you always listen off-axis, but it is educational, none-the-less, to hear the abrupt transitions in output and response, in some cases like a "Venitian blinds" effect.  It seems odd to me that phasing/tuning for HF can be similar to finding the right spot for bass, where it just suddenly appears out of nowhere when you finally position the speakers (or yourself) correctly, except with HF, of course, we're talking very small movements making big changes.

Best regards,
Paul S

11-07-2006 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 9,540
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 56
Post ID: 3097
Reply to: 3094
Re: ribbons - we will see...

 Paul S wrote:
Likely, the wider ribbons are less good for HF-only than a long, narrow ribbon, like the G3 and G3Si use.  Across the board, the larger the ribbon gets (and the lower the ribbon is made to go), the worse the dynamics at a higher frequency.  This gets confusing when the bigger ribbons are more efficient, but I think it is true at given SPL at HF.  Although I have never heard a ribbon that did not lack the last word in dynamics, the smallest and lightest I have tried, up high, have better dynamic sound than the larger "damped" ribbons, etc.  There is no doubt that the damped (coated and/or backed/and/or faced) "ribbons" are the worst of the ribbons in terms of the dynamic softness you note (at least, as I understand it).  They seem to excell at making nasty highs more tolerable.

You mention trying a 3rd order x-over, and my first thought of why you might do this would be to keep the ribbon from messing up what the S2 does better.  Still, I will be surprised if the "best" ribbon you find doesn't work best with a more gradual x-over. 

If you haven't done it yet, try moving your head around through the output axes of your S2 and the ribbon-du-jour.  *Perhaps* phasing is less important if you always listen off-axis, but it is educational, none-the-less, to hear the abrupt transitions in output and response, in some cases like a "Venitian blinds" effect.  It seems odd to me that phasing/tuning for HF can be similar to finding the right spot for bass, where it just suddenly appears out of nowhere when you finally position the speakers (or yourself) correctly, except with HF, of course, we're talking very small movements making big changes.
Paul, I know nothing about ribbons drivers and what makes them to sound in one or other ways.  I comment usually only on the subjects that I had personal exposure; I never made any ribbons or even took apart any existing. I am not wiling to repeat what others say about ribbons because… I do not believe to anybody but only to myself. So, since I did not deal with ribbons personally I have no opinion about what makes them good.

Some people who visit my site, looking at my Melquiades and Macondo sagas might feel that I am some kind of DIY enthusiast but in realty I hate DIY and I have writhen a lot about my view on the stupid DIY subject. I humiliate myself to the level when I begin to learn a narrow field and do something myself only when I exhausted the opportunity to find somebody who would be capable to do what is necessary at the demanded level. I would always prefer to pay for the labor of professionals that know what they do instead of disgracing myself and filling the “gap of available”. Audio is really more interesting then juts DIYing…

So, far I’m optimistic about the ribbons. The SA8535 does fine and in few days I will try it with it’s wave-guide. The Arum Cantus G1 should be an interesting to try as well. In addition to everything I am exercising with ribbons something that I called  “None-Inverted High End”:

http://www.goodsoundclub.com/TreeItem.aspx?PostID=2920

The point is that I have very specific, narrow requirement, and I was lucky end to find a guy who feel that he will be up to the task to address those requirement. He is THE ribbon persons and will be building the necessary tweeter. THAT IS EXACTLY how the REAL high-end should operate.  I do not know result we will end up (it still might sound like crap in the end) but so far I’m very comfortable and pleased with his progress. Also, I am quite comfortable with the progress I’m getting from looking into high sensitivity ribbons… If I will be able to get more dynamic and more “contrast” from them (in the limited range of 12K and up)  then it will be it.

Rgs,
Romy the caT


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
11-13-2006 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 9,540
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 57
Post ID: 3144
Reply to: 3093
The SA8535: final conclusion.

OK, now the SA8535 driver is fully broken-in and well-habituated. I have no idea how the “Stage Accompany” suggests using this driver from 1000Hz! From what I observe, at MF this driver sounds very “flat” and very none-impressive. I have suspicion that any driver of this topology, would it be a ribbon or isodynamic, do not do well at MF. I presume that this is why I so hate ribbons – because all ribbons in all speakers that I heard were crossed too unforgivably low. Even at 12KHz and first order, when the driver has long tail into MF the MF “flatness” very severally deprecates the sound of SA8535 driver. The higher I went and the shaper it was the better driver performed. At 12KHz-14KHz with second-third order the SA8535 does very well and I like it a lot. Would I consider it as a perfect tweeter? Nope, I can’t, as there is one very specific area where I very much do not like what the SA8535 does.

Subjectively, although the HF of the SA8535 extremity clean but they are “too unhurried”. They became wonderfully mellow and forgivingly placid but they are disabled to play aggressive, crisp or destructively hostile if the musical calls upon it. The driver does have a high sensitivity and presumably extended dynamic capacity… but it hardly auditable as the harder driver plays the less transient it sounds. I do not know what it is: some kind of compression or a restrictive contribution of the plastic in witch the ribbons imbedded but it auditable and it is hold the SA8535 back from being a perfect tweeter.

Rgs,
Romy the caT


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
12-20-2006 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 9,540
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 58
Post ID: 3321
Reply to: 2974
When Ribbons are not just ribbons.

Do you remember in the brilliant cartoon “Ice Age” there was that lovely character who was going of his way in his infinite chase for the nut? I feel audio people have the sale obsession with ribbons, or more precisely with importer use it ribbons. Ribbons are HF transducers and it is what they do well. Some ribbons can do lower frequencies but the quality of the sound from ribbons gradually going down with each hertz. The ribbons that I have seen were OK after 8K-10K, still there are countless people out there who keep pushing ribbons doe to 1000-2000Hz, or even lower. Yes, ribbons can handle it, they can handle all the way down if they made to do so, but ribbons do not sound there well and they completely are loosing the advance of it’s topology is they used lower then HF region.

The AA’s Sewers always was a wonderful place to find some evidences of audio–idiocy. I went today at to the Sewers and the very first what I have seen was: “Which Ribbon Tweeter for JBL D130 2-way?” With all stupidity of the objectives to use using D130 and ribbon for two ways it is actually what most of the people do.

Yes, I know, there are some people who would disagree with me. Brian Cheney of VMPS would say”no cones”, juts the VMPS’ ribbons. I have seen his latest V-shaped large ribbons speaker and I feel that Brian completely enslaved his auditable rational to a celebration of his design concepts.  I like Brian Cheney a lot but I disagree with his loudspeakers objectives. I personally feel that as ribbon dive under 8K they way out of their rank and it is possible to get more condoled and noble result by the means of other topologies…

Rgs,
Romy the Cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
12-20-2006 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Paul S
San Diego, California, USA
Posts 2,148
Joined on 10-12-2006

Post #: 59
Post ID: 3323
Reply to: 3321
Ribbon Man
It is interesting indeed how people allow their attention to go from fixation to fixation without ever changing/adapting methodology, believing none the less that each single idea in turn is The Answer.  I remember the first time I heard the celebrated large Apogee speaker (the Crepetus Rex, or something like that), after first having heard nothing but praise for the thing.  Of course, it proved to be about as bad as it gets.   It is a tribute to human endurance that anyone could stay in a room with the thing, let alon hone in on any value it might have had.  That it was driven at the time by its electronic corollary - a giant "zero-distortion" SS amp - only made the experience worse, yet at the same time more educational, because here we had the then-current "State of the Art" - "Full-range Ribbons" and "Perfect Gain" - sounding much worse than old Hartsfields driven by, say, Scott tube amps, or even old KLH 9s or Quad 57s driven by Dynakits.

But who really would know from this that ribbons sucked as MF transducers?  Maybe (well, not maybe) it was just this particular implementation.  So I checked in with various ribbon offerings over the years, and I learned that big ribbons ribbons suck; that any ribbon sucks below about 8k; and that coated ribbons tend to sound coated.  Also, good luck with "linearity" from any ribbon over any extended frequency range (not even a full HF octave).

So more power to nice-guy Brian Cheney, and all the other stuck-on-a-trick designers.  It may even be that they do come up with a good idea every once in a while.  But the chances are as good as not that any good that comes from their efforts will do its best in a form somewhat altered from how they envisioned it, and also in a different context.

The inventors I like best are like Tesla, just way out there, with just the sparks from their ideas giving us so much at once that it takes decades, or longer, to digest and effectively realize them.

On the one hand I wish there was more good, fully implemented, affordable stuff out there.  OTOH, I am just as happy to stick by my own fixation:  Maybe if I give it just this one little tweak...

Best regards,
Paul
01-05-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
robmatthew
Posts 1
Joined on 01-05-2007

Post #: 60
Post ID: 3439
Reply to: 2993
TAD PT-R9
I read your comments re: the PT-R9.

I have a pair which also measure about 9 dB below my Supravox 200 EXC drivers in sensitivity using the Earthworks measuring mike on the DEQX unit. They do sound very nice, however.

Also, I find this site to be very informative and interesting!

Best regards,

Bob Figlio
02-16-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 9,540
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 61
Post ID: 3764
Reply to: 2974
The new Tweeters for Macondo are here.

As some you guys who flow this thread know my search for Macondo lead me to the world of ribbons. In the mid of last October some of you (I believe it was Chris) pointed out to the RAAL company. I was skeptical but decided to explore the opportunely. This lead to very unexpected result and to a very interesting project. After many conversations RAAL and me formed out a “research projects” endorsing some very “obnoxious” requirements with the ambition to make a “new tweeter”. Well, after a few a month and few hundreds (thousands!) dollars the project is through and the tweeters are sitting here.

I’m making this post to logically summarize this thread. All information about my experiences with the “RAAL WATER DROP TWEETER” will be posted in a dedicated thread. Thanks for everyone who suggests different things – it was educational thread.

Chris, in the begging of the thread I promised that person who will lead me to a new tweeter will get a gift. Well, I need to play with this tweeter for a while to figure out if the project was success. Then I will in my ultimate Jewish frugality determine how valuable the gift should be…. :-)

Stand by guys, more information will be coming, it should be very interesting...
Romy the Cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
02-17-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
cv
Derby, United Kingdom
Posts 173
Joined on 09-15-2004

Post #: 62
Post ID: 3767
Reply to: 3764
RAAL's arrival
Hello Romy,
I just saw the photos - looks like fantastic work by Aleks.
As for the gift - well, if the project is a success and me and other S2 users can buy tweeters with that spec and sound , and without the risk and R&D costs - surely that's a gift enough?
Best,
cv

03-08-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 9,540
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 63
Post ID: 3947
Reply to: 2974
Another tweeter for Macondo’s S2.

BTW, I would like to mention one more opportunity for the folks who are playing with S2 driver.

There is another interesting tweeter option: use the HF section of the Tannoy’s dual concentric drivers (only form 50s-60s). The design of those drivers was very simples and to disassemble the driver into one very easy manageable tweeter of very easy to do. The tweet looks like around 100dB sensitivity. The horn in there garbage and might be worked with and you would need own 2-4 order crossover as the Tannoy’s dual concentric tweeter is essentially a MF driver. If I do not have the RAAL’s “Water Drop” I would defiantly go further with it as I feel it might be worthy.

It is all yours.
The Cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
12-14-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 9,540
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 64
Post ID: 6121
Reply to: 2974
Townshend Audio Ribbon Tweeter

Here is another very interning solution to compliment S2 driver with top end. Townshend Audio have their Ribbon Tweeter with reported 110dB sensitivity and price of $1500.

http://www.townshendaudio.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=27&Itemid=81

I never had this tweeter and I have no intention to try but for someone who look for options to use a Ribbon Tweeter to compliment S2 it might be an opportunity.

The caT


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
12-15-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 9,540
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 65
Post ID: 6129
Reply to: 6121
Correction: Townshend Ribbon and sensitivity.
 Romy the Cat wrote:
Here is another very interning solution to compliment S2 driver with top end. Townshend Audio have their Ribbon Tweeter with reported 110dB sensitivity and price of $1500.

http://www.townshendaudio.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=27&Itemid=81

I never had this tweeter and I have no intention to try but for someone who look for options to use a Ribbon Tweeter to compliment S2 it might be an opportunity. The caT
Actually looking more at the Townshend Ribbon I realized that it would not be so perfect for S2. For S2 you would need 103dB-109dB at 15kHz but the Townshend has 88dB. Too little…. They claim 110dB at 50K that is hardly relevant for practical applications. Sorry, it was a wrong alert.


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Page 3 of 3 (65 items) Select Pages:  « 1 2 3
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  Electro-Voice T350, T35, + Fostex tweeters...  TAD ET-703...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     34  383597  04-28-2005
  »  New  Macondo Horns: biography...  Macondo with Pussy Eyes....  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     2  45751  05-18-2005
  »  New  Null-set dipole butterfly tweeters...  Null-set dipole butterfly tweeters...  Audio Discussions  Forum     1  21226  10-16-2006
  »  New  Lowther Driver..  Schadenfreude II...  Audio Discussions  Forum     61  409086  11-15-2006
  »  New  The most promising “best” commercial speaker..  Viva Audio...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     190  1268813  12-06-2006
  »  New  RAAL “Water Drop” tweeter for Macondo...  Your comment takes me by surprise...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     77  668204  02-16-2007
  »  New  EnABL: Just a note to awaken all of you peaceful sleepe..  I think "the Russian" is simply trying to con...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     14  77740  04-14-2007
  »  New  Simpson Microphones thread...  A whole another subject....  Audio Discussions  Forum     45  221071  10-21-2007
  »  New  Metal domes..  Try the one Lansche is using...  Audio Discussions  Forum     6  53021  11-08-2007
  »  New  The Active High Frequency Solution - AHFS..  Small problems with the camera lens can be mistaken for...  Playback Listening  Forum     5  39665  02-06-2008
  »  New  Horn loaded ribbons and other Vasyachkin’s tangents......  Applied / evolved audio...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     33  146743  11-02-2008
  »  New  Living Voice Loudspeaker..  A Polish Infomercial from Kevin Scott....  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     80  434369  08-09-2009
  »  New  About HF Binaurallism..  What is going on now....  Playback Listening  Forum     1  15487  11-27-2010
Home Page  |  Last 24Hours  | Search  |  SiteMap  | Questions or Problems | Copyright Note
The content of all messages within the Forums Copyright © by authors of the posts